2022-08-15 01:31:43

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/8] clk: imx93: new gate API and composite update

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

V2:
Add A-b from Rob
Add a new patch 2 reported by intel test robot
Use Abel's new address for sending mail

The current clk driver use gate API as i.MX8M*, the gate2 API use 0x3 as
val/mask, however i.MX93 LPCG DIRECT use BIT0 as on/off gate. So clk
disable unused actually not gate off the LPCG clocks.
And i.MX93 has AUTHEN feature, so add a new API to support i.MX93 clk gate.

i.MX93 CCM ROOT has slice busy check bit when updating register value, add
check. CCM ROOT also has AUTHEN whitelist, so add DID check.

Besides the gate/composite update, add MU[X] and SAI IPG clk in this
patchset

This patchset has got reviewed in NXP internal, so I keep R-b tag here.
For those that have some change compared with downstream, R-b tag dropped.

Peng Fan (8):
dt-bindings: clock: imx93-clock: add more MU/SAI clocks
clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with CONFIG_OF
clk: imx: clk-composite-93: check slice busy
clk: imx: clk-composite-93: check white_list
clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk gate
clk: imx93: switch to use new clk gate API
clk: imx93: add MU1/2 clock
clk: imx93: add SAI IPG clk

drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 32 ++--
drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 9 +-
include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h | 9 +-
6 files changed, 403 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c

--
2.37.1


2022-08-15 01:31:45

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: imx93-clock: add more MU/SAI clocks

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

Add MU[1,2]_[A,B] clock entries.
Add SAI IPG clock entries.

Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
---
include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h
index 21fda9c5cb5e..19bc32788d81 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h
@@ -196,6 +196,13 @@
#define IMX93_CLK_TMC_GATE 187
#define IMX93_CLK_PMRO_GATE 188
#define IMX93_CLK_32K 189
-#define IMX93_CLK_END 190
+#define IMX93_CLK_SAI1_IPG 190
+#define IMX93_CLK_SAI2_IPG 191
+#define IMX93_CLK_SAI3_IPG 192
+#define IMX93_CLK_MU1_A_GATE 193
+#define IMX93_CLK_MU1_B_GATE 194
+#define IMX93_CLK_MU2_A_GATE 195
+#define IMX93_CLK_MU2_B_GATE 196
+#define IMX93_CLK_END 197

#endif
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 01:32:25

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 4/8] clk: imx: clk-composite-93: check white_list

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

The CCM ROOT AUTHEN register WHITE_LIST indicate:
Each bit in this field represent for one domain. Bit16~Bit31 represent
for DOMAIN0~DOMAIN15 respectively. Only corresponding bit of the domains
is set to 1 can change the registers of this Clock Root.

i.MX93 DID is 3, so if BIT(3 + WHITE_LIST_SHIFT) is 0, the clk should be
set to read only. To make the imx93_clk_composite_flags be reusable,
add a new parameter named did(domain id);

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c | 8 ++++++--
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 +-
drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
index 19f4037e6cca..74a66b0203e4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
#define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)

+#define WHITE_LIST_SHIFT 16
+
static int imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(struct clk_hw *hw, void __iomem *reg)
{
int ret;
@@ -180,7 +182,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_mux_ops = {
};

struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *parent_names,
- int num_parents, void __iomem *reg,
+ int num_parents, void __iomem *reg, u32 domain_id,
unsigned long flags)
{
struct clk_hw *hw = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM), *mux_hw;
@@ -189,6 +191,7 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *p
struct clk_gate *gate = NULL;
struct clk_mux *mux = NULL;
bool clk_ro = false;
+ u32 authen;

mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mux)
@@ -211,7 +214,8 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *p
div->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
div->flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST;

- if (!(readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET) & TZ_NS_MASK))
+ authen = readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
+ if (!(authen & TZ_NS_MASK) || !(authen & BIT(WHITE_LIST_SHIFT + domain_id)))
clk_ro = true;

if (clk_ro) {
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
index 5099048b7916..0d5c11bb3659 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
root = &root_array[i];
clks[root->clk] = imx93_clk_composite_flags(root->name,
parent_names[root->sel],
- 4, base + root->off,
+ 4, base + root->off, 3,
root->flags);
}

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
index 5061a06468df..396a5ea75083 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
@@ -445,9 +445,10 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name,
const char * const *parent_names,
int num_parents,
void __iomem *reg,
+ u32 domain_id,
unsigned long flags);
-#define imx93_clk_composite(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg) \
- imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, \
+#define imx93_clk_composite(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, domain_id) \
+ imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, domain_id \
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)

struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_divider_gate(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 01:32:29

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 5/8] clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk gate

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

i.MX93 LPCG is different from i.MX8M CCGR. Although imx_clk_hw_gate4_flags
is used here, it not strictly match i.MX93. i.MX93 has such design:
- LPCG_DIRECT use BIT0 as on/off gate when LPCG_AUTHEN CPU_LPM is 0
- LPCG_LPM_CUR use BIT[2:0] as on/off gate when LPCG_AUTHEN CPU_LPM is 1

The current implementation suppose CPU_LPM is 0, and use LPCG_DIRECT
BIT[1:0] as on/off gate. Although BIT1 is touched, actually BIT1 is
reserved.

And imx_clk_hw_gate4_flags use mask 0x3 to determine whether the clk
is enabled or not, but i.MX93 LPCG only use BIT0 to control when CPU_LPM
is 0. So clk disabled unused during kernel boot not able to gate off
the unused clocks.

To match i.MX93 LPCG, introduce imx93_clk_gate.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 4 +
3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
index 88b9b9285d22..89fe72327788 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MN) += clk-imx8mn.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MP) += clk-imx8mp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o

-obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX93) += clk-imx93.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX93) += clk-imx93.o clk-gate-93.o

obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += clk-imx-scu.o clk-imx-lpcg-scu.o
clk-imx-scu-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8QXP) += clk-scu.o clk-imx8qxp.o \
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ceb56b290394
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Copyright 2022 NXP
+ *
+ * Peng Fan <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "clk.h"
+
+#define DIRECT_OFFSET 0x0
+
+/*
+ * 0b000 - LPCG will be OFF in any CPU mode.
+ * 0b100 - LPCG will be ON in any CPU mode.
+ */
+#define LPM_SETTING_OFF 0x0
+#define LPM_SETTING_ON 0x4
+
+#define LPM_CUR_OFFSET 0x1c
+
+#define AUTHEN_OFFSET 0x30
+#define CPULPM_EN BIT(2)
+#define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
+#define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)
+
+#define WHITE_LIST_SHIFT 16
+
+struct imx93_clk_gate {
+ struct clk_hw hw;
+ void __iomem *reg;
+ u32 bit_idx;
+ u32 val;
+ u32 mask;
+ spinlock_t *lock;
+ unsigned int *share_count;
+};
+
+#define to_imx93_clk_gate(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct imx93_clk_gate, hw)
+
+static void imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(struct clk_hw *hw, bool enable)
+{
+ struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = readl(gate->reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
+ if (val & CPULPM_EN) {
+ val = enable ? LPM_SETTING_ON : LPM_SETTING_OFF;
+ writel(val, gate->reg + LPM_CUR_OFFSET);
+ } else {
+ val = readl(gate->reg + DIRECT_OFFSET);
+ val &= ~(gate->mask << gate->bit_idx);
+ if (enable)
+ val |= (gate->val & gate->mask) << gate->bit_idx;
+ writel(val, gate->reg + DIRECT_OFFSET);
+ }
+}
+
+static int imx93_clk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
+
+ if (gate->share_count && (*gate->share_count)++ > 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, true);
+out:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void imx93_clk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
+
+ if (gate->share_count) {
+ if (WARN_ON(*gate->share_count == 0))
+ goto out;
+ else if (--(*gate->share_count) > 0)
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, false);
+out:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int imx93_clk_gate_reg_is_enabled(struct imx93_clk_gate *gate)
+{
+ u32 val = readl(gate->reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
+
+ if (val & CPULPM_EN) {
+ val = readl(gate->reg + LPM_CUR_OFFSET);
+ if (val == LPM_SETTING_ON)
+ return 1;
+ } else {
+ val = readl(gate->reg);
+ if (((val >> gate->bit_idx) & gate->mask) == gate->val)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
+
+ ret = imx93_clk_gate_reg_is_enabled(gate);
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void imx93_clk_gate_disable_unused(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
+
+ if (!gate->share_count || *gate->share_count == 0)
+ imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, false);
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_gate_ops = {
+ .enable = imx93_clk_gate_enable,
+ .disable = imx93_clk_gate_disable,
+ .disable_unused = imx93_clk_gate_disable_unused,
+ .is_enabled = imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled,
+};
+
+static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_gate_ro_ops = {
+ .is_enabled = imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled,
+};
+
+struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name, const char *parent_name,
+ unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u32 bit_idx, u32 val,
+ u32 mask, u32 domain_id, unsigned int *share_count)
+{
+ struct imx93_clk_gate *gate;
+ struct clk_hw *hw;
+ struct clk_init_data init;
+ int ret;
+ u32 authen;
+
+ gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct imx93_clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!gate)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ gate->reg = reg;
+ gate->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
+ gate->bit_idx = bit_idx;
+ gate->val = val;
+ gate->mask = mask;
+ gate->share_count = share_count;
+
+ init.name = name;
+ init.ops = &imx93_clk_gate_ops;
+ init.flags = flags | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE;
+ init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL;
+ init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0;
+
+ gate->hw.init = &init;
+ hw = &gate->hw;
+
+ authen = readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
+ if (!(authen & TZ_NS_MASK) || !(authen & BIT(WHITE_LIST_SHIFT + domain_id)))
+ init.ops = &imx93_clk_gate_ro_ops;
+
+ ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
+ if (ret) {
+ kfree(gate);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
+
+ return hw;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(imx93_clk_gate);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
index 396a5ea75083..dd49f90110e8 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
@@ -451,6 +451,10 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name,
imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, domain_id \
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)

+struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name, const char *parent_name,
+ unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u32 bit_idx, u32 val,
+ u32 mask, u32 domain_id, unsigned int *share_count);
+
struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_divider_gate(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u8 width,
u8 clk_divider_flags, const struct clk_div_table *table,
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 01:33:36

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 6/8] clk: imx93: switch to use new clk gate API

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

Use i.MX93 specific clk gate API

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
index 0d5c11bb3659..73d30a2e64b0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static const struct imx93_clk_ccgr {
char *parent_name;
u32 off;
unsigned long flags;
+ u32 *shared_count;
} ccgr_array[] = {
{ IMX93_CLK_A55_GATE, "a55", "a55_root", 0x8000, },
/* M33 critical clk for system run */
@@ -299,10 +300,9 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ccgr_array); i++) {
ccgr = &ccgr_array[i];
- clks[ccgr->clk] = imx_clk_hw_gate4_flags(ccgr->name,
- ccgr->parent_name,
- base + ccgr->off, 0,
- ccgr->flags);
+ clks[ccgr->clk] = imx93_clk_gate(NULL, ccgr->name, ccgr->parent_name,
+ ccgr->flags, base + ccgr->off, 0, 1, 1, 3,
+ ccgr->shared_count);
}

imx_check_clk_hws(clks, IMX93_CLK_END);
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 01:33:46

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 7/8] clk: imx93: add MU1/2 clock

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

The clk tree should be as:
bus_aon_root------>\ /--->MU1_B IP
-->MU_B gate-->
bus_wakeup_root--->/ \--->MU2_B IP

bus_aon_root------>\ /--->MU1_A IP
-->MU_A gate-->
bus_wakeup_root--->/ \--->MU2_A IP

So need use shared count gate. And linux use MU_B,
so set MU_A clk as CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
index 73d30a2e64b0..4008ab075dfe 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ enum clk_sel {
MAX_SEL
};

+static u32 share_count_mub;
+
static const char *parent_names[MAX_SEL][4] = {
{"osc_24m", "sys_pll_pfd0_div2", "sys_pll_pfd1_div2", "video_pll"},
{"osc_24m", "sys_pll_pfd0_div2", "sys_pll_pfd1_div2", "sys_pll_pfd2_div2"},
@@ -159,8 +161,10 @@ static const struct imx93_clk_ccgr {
{ IMX93_CLK_WDOG5_GATE, "wdog5", "osc_24m", 0x8400, },
{ IMX93_CLK_SEMA1_GATE, "sema1", "bus_aon_root", 0x8440, },
{ IMX93_CLK_SEMA2_GATE, "sema2", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x8480, },
- { IMX93_CLK_MU_A_GATE, "mu_a", "bus_aon_root", 0x84c0, },
- { IMX93_CLK_MU_B_GATE, "mu_b", "bus_aon_root", 0x8500, },
+ { IMX93_CLK_MU1_A_GATE, "mu1_a", "bus_aon_root", 0x84c0, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
+ { IMX93_CLK_MU2_A_GATE, "mu2_a", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x84c0, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
+ { IMX93_CLK_MU1_B_GATE, "mu1_b", "bus_aon_root", 0x8500, 0, &share_count_mub },
+ { IMX93_CLK_MU2_B_GATE, "mu2_b", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x8500, 0, &share_count_mub },
{ IMX93_CLK_EDMA1_GATE, "edma1", "m33_root", 0x8540, },
{ IMX93_CLK_EDMA2_GATE, "edma2", "wakeup_axi_root", 0x8580, },
{ IMX93_CLK_FLEXSPI1_GATE, "flexspi", "flexspi_root", 0x8640, },
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 01:39:15

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with CONFIG_OF

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

There is build warning when CONFIG_OF is not selected.
>> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c:324:34: warning: 'imx93_clk_of_match'
>> defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
324 | static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Use CONFIG_OF to guard imx93_clk_of_match to avoid build warning.

Fixes: 24defbe194b6 ("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
index f5c9fa40491c..5099048b7916 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
@@ -321,11 +321,13 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ccm" },
{ /* Sentinel */ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_clk_of_match);
+#endif

static struct platform_driver imx93_clk_driver = {
.probe = imx93_clocks_probe,
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 01:40:23

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/8] clk: imx: clk-composite-93: check slice busy

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

i.MX93 CCM ROOT STAT register has a SLICE_BUSY bit:
indication for clock generation logic is applying new setting.
0b - Clock generation logic is not busy.
1b - Clock generation logic is applying new setting.

So when set parent/rate/gate, need check this bit.

Introduce specific ops to do the work.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 160 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
index b44619aa5ca5..19f4037e6cca 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
@@ -9,20 +9,176 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>

#include "clk.h"

+#define TIMEOUT_US 500U
+
#define CCM_DIV_SHIFT 0
#define CCM_DIV_WIDTH 8
#define CCM_MUX_SHIFT 8
#define CCM_MUX_MASK 3
#define CCM_OFF_SHIFT 24
+#define CCM_BUSY_SHIFT 28

+#define STAT_OFFSET 0x4
#define AUTHEN_OFFSET 0x30
#define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
#define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)

+static int imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(struct clk_hw *hw, void __iomem *reg)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u32 val;
+
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(reg + STAT_OFFSET, val, !(val & BIT(CCM_BUSY_SHIFT)),
+ 0, TIMEOUT_US);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("Slice[%s] busy timeout\n", clk_hw_get_name(hw));
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void imx93_clk_composite_gate_endisable(struct clk_hw *hw, int enable)
+{
+ struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(hw);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u32 reg;
+
+ if (gate->lock)
+ spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
+
+ reg = readl(gate->reg);
+
+ if (enable)
+ reg &= ~BIT(gate->bit_idx);
+ else
+ reg |= BIT(gate->bit_idx);
+
+ writel(reg, gate->reg);
+
+ imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(hw, gate->reg);
+
+ if (gate->lock)
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int imx93_clk_composite_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ imx93_clk_composite_gate_endisable(hw, 1);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void imx93_clk_composite_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ imx93_clk_composite_gate_endisable(hw, 0);
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_gate_ops = {
+ .enable = imx93_clk_composite_gate_enable,
+ .disable = imx93_clk_composite_gate_disable,
+ .is_enabled = clk_gate_is_enabled,
+};
+
+static unsigned long
+imx93_clk_composite_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+ return clk_divider_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate);
+}
+
+static long
+imx93_clk_composite_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, unsigned long *prate)
+{
+ return clk_divider_ops.round_rate(hw, rate, prate);
+}
+
+static int
+imx93_clk_composite_divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
+{
+ return clk_divider_ops.determine_rate(hw, req);
+}
+
+static int imx93_clk_composite_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+ unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+ struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw);
+ int value;
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
+ u32 val;
+ int ret;
+
+ value = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, divider->table, divider->width, divider->flags);
+ if (value < 0)
+ return value;
+
+ if (divider->lock)
+ spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags);
+
+ val = readl(divider->reg);
+ val &= ~(clk_div_mask(divider->width) << divider->shift);
+ val |= (u32)value << divider->shift;
+ writel(val, divider->reg);
+
+ ret = imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(hw, divider->reg);
+
+ if (divider->lock)
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(divider->lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_divider_ops = {
+ .recalc_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_recalc_rate,
+ .round_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_round_rate,
+ .determine_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_determine_rate,
+ .set_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_set_rate,
+};
+
+static u8 imx93_clk_composite_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ return clk_mux_ops.get_parent(hw);
+}
+
+static int imx93_clk_composite_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
+{
+ struct clk_mux *mux = to_clk_mux(hw);
+ u32 val = clk_mux_index_to_val(mux->table, mux->flags, index);
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
+ u32 reg;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (mux->lock)
+ spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
+
+ reg = readl(mux->reg);
+ reg &= ~(mux->mask << mux->shift);
+ val = val << mux->shift;
+ reg |= val;
+ writel(reg, mux->reg);
+
+ ret = imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(hw, mux->reg);
+
+ if (mux->lock)
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+imx93_clk_composite_mux_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
+{
+ return clk_mux_ops.determine_rate(hw, req);
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_mux_ops = {
+ .get_parent = imx93_clk_composite_mux_get_parent,
+ .set_parent = imx93_clk_composite_mux_set_parent,
+ .determine_rate = imx93_clk_composite_mux_determine_rate,
+};
+
struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *parent_names,
int num_parents, void __iomem *reg,
unsigned long flags)
@@ -74,9 +230,10 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *p
gate->flags = CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE;

hw = clk_hw_register_composite(NULL, name, parent_names, num_parents,
- mux_hw, &clk_mux_ops, div_hw,
- &clk_divider_ops, gate_hw,
- &clk_gate_ops, flags | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT);
+ mux_hw, &imx93_clk_composite_mux_ops, div_hw,
+ &imx93_clk_composite_divider_ops, gate_hw,
+ &imx93_clk_composite_gate_ops,
+ flags | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT);
}

if (IS_ERR(hw))
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 01:50:01

by Peng Fan (OSS)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 8/8] clk: imx93: add SAI IPG clk

From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

The clk topology is as below:
bus_aon_root------>\ /--->SAI IPG
-->SAI LPCG gate-->
sai[x]_clk_root--->/ \--->SAI MCLK

So use shared count as i.MX93 MU_B gate.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
index 4008ab075dfe..6a76b9fdf18d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ enum clk_sel {
MAX_SEL
};

+static u32 share_count_sai1;
+static u32 share_count_sai2;
+static u32 share_count_sai3;
static u32 share_count_mub;

static const char *parent_names[MAX_SEL][4] = {
@@ -215,9 +218,12 @@ static const struct imx93_clk_ccgr {
{ IMX93_CLK_USDHC1_GATE, "usdhc1", "usdhc1_root", 0x9380, },
{ IMX93_CLK_USDHC2_GATE, "usdhc2", "usdhc2_root", 0x93c0, },
{ IMX93_CLK_USDHC3_GATE, "usdhc3", "usdhc3_root", 0x9400, },
- { IMX93_CLK_SAI1_GATE, "sai1", "sai1_root", 0x9440, },
- { IMX93_CLK_SAI2_GATE, "sai2", "sai2_root", 0x9480, },
- { IMX93_CLK_SAI3_GATE, "sai3", "sai3_root", 0x94c0, },
+ { IMX93_CLK_SAI1_GATE, "sai1", "sai1_root", 0x9440, 0, &share_count_sai1},
+ { IMX93_CLK_SAI1_IPG, "sai1_ipg_clk", "bus_aon_root", 0x9440, 0, &share_count_sai1},
+ { IMX93_CLK_SAI2_GATE, "sai2", "sai2_root", 0x9480, 0, &share_count_sai2},
+ { IMX93_CLK_SAI2_IPG, "sai2_ipg_clk", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x9480, 0, &share_count_sai2},
+ { IMX93_CLK_SAI3_GATE, "sai3", "sai3_root", 0x94c0, 0, &share_count_sai3},
+ { IMX93_CLK_SAI3_IPG, "sai3_ipg_clk", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x94c0, 0, &share_count_sai3},
{ IMX93_CLK_MIPI_CSI_GATE, "mipi_csi", "media_apb_root", 0x9580, },
{ IMX93_CLK_MIPI_DSI_GATE, "mipi_dsi", "media_apb_root", 0x95c0, },
{ IMX93_CLK_LVDS_GATE, "lvds", "media_ldb_root", 0x9600, },
--
2.37.1

2022-08-15 08:31:06

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with CONFIG_OF

On 22-08-15 08:19:52, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with
> > CONFIG_OF
> >
> > On 22-08-15 09:30:33, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > There is build warning when CONFIG_OF is not selected.
> > > >> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c:324:34: warning: 'imx93_clk_of_match'
> > > >> defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> > > 324 | static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Use CONFIG_OF to guard imx93_clk_of_match to avoid build warning.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 24defbe194b6 ("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk")
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> > > index f5c9fa40491c..5099048b7916 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> > > @@ -321,11 +321,13 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> >
> > Hmm, I'm not sure if we should do this or rather should we make this driver
> > depend somehow on CONFIG_OF in Kconfig.
> >
> > Looking at the other i.MX clock drivers, it would seem we need this for all
> > them too.
>
> No. It is i.MX93 use of_match_ptr, I could drop it as i.MX8M.
>
> Thanks,
> Peng.

Right. Thanks for pointing that out.

>
> >
> > I fairly OK with this, but maybe Stephen suggests something different.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
> >

Oups, wrong address here too.

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

> > > static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ccm" },
> > > { /* Sentinel */ },
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_clk_of_match);
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > static struct platform_driver imx93_clk_driver = {
> > > .probe = imx93_clocks_probe,
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >

2022-08-15 08:36:46

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with CONFIG_OF

On 22-08-15 09:30:33, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> There is build warning when CONFIG_OF is not selected.
> >> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c:324:34: warning: 'imx93_clk_of_match'
> >> defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> 324 | static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Use CONFIG_OF to guard imx93_clk_of_match to avoid build warning.
>
> Fixes: 24defbe194b6 ("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> index f5c9fa40491c..5099048b7916 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> @@ -321,11 +321,13 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF

Hmm, I'm not sure if we should do this or rather should we make this driver
depend somehow on CONFIG_OF in Kconfig.

Looking at the other i.MX clock drivers, it would seem we need this for
all them too.

I fairly OK with this, but maybe Stephen suggests something different.

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

> static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ccm" },
> { /* Sentinel */ },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_clk_of_match);
> +#endif
>
> static struct platform_driver imx93_clk_driver = {
> .probe = imx93_clocks_probe,
> --
> 2.37.1
>

2022-08-15 08:53:53

by Peng Fan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with CONFIG_OF

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] clk: imx93: guard imx93_clk_of_match with
> CONFIG_OF
>
> On 22-08-15 09:30:33, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> >
> > There is build warning when CONFIG_OF is not selected.
> > >> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c:324:34: warning: 'imx93_clk_of_match'
> > >> defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> > 324 | static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Use CONFIG_OF to guard imx93_clk_of_match to avoid build warning.
> >
> > Fixes: 24defbe194b6 ("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> > index f5c9fa40491c..5099048b7916 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> > @@ -321,11 +321,13 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure if we should do this or rather should we make this driver
> depend somehow on CONFIG_OF in Kconfig.
>
> Looking at the other i.MX clock drivers, it would seem we need this for all
> them too.

No. It is i.MX93 use of_match_ptr, I could drop it as i.MX8M.

Thanks,
Peng.

>
> I fairly OK with this, but maybe Stephen suggests something different.
>
> Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
>
> > static const struct of_device_id imx93_clk_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-ccm" },
> > { /* Sentinel */ },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_clk_of_match);
> > +#endif
> >
> > static struct platform_driver imx93_clk_driver = {
> > .probe = imx93_clocks_probe,
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >

2022-08-15 09:03:03

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: imx93-clock: add more MU/SAI clocks

On 22-08-15 09:30:32, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> Add MU[1,2]_[A,B] clock entries.
> Add SAI IPG clock entries.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

> ---
> include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h
> index 21fda9c5cb5e..19bc32788d81 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,13 @@
> #define IMX93_CLK_TMC_GATE 187
> #define IMX93_CLK_PMRO_GATE 188
> #define IMX93_CLK_32K 189
> -#define IMX93_CLK_END 190
> +#define IMX93_CLK_SAI1_IPG 190
> +#define IMX93_CLK_SAI2_IPG 191
> +#define IMX93_CLK_SAI3_IPG 192
> +#define IMX93_CLK_MU1_A_GATE 193
> +#define IMX93_CLK_MU1_B_GATE 194
> +#define IMX93_CLK_MU2_A_GATE 195
> +#define IMX93_CLK_MU2_B_GATE 196
> +#define IMX93_CLK_END 197
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.37.1
>

2022-08-15 09:03:28

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/8] clk: imx: clk-composite-93: check slice busy

On 22-08-15 09:30:34, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> i.MX93 CCM ROOT STAT register has a SLICE_BUSY bit:
> indication for clock generation logic is applying new setting.
> 0b - Clock generation logic is not busy.
> 1b - Clock generation logic is applying new setting.
>
> So when set parent/rate/gate, need check this bit.
>
> Introduce specific ops to do the work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 160 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> index b44619aa5ca5..19f4037e6cca 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> @@ -9,20 +9,176 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include "clk.h"
>
> +#define TIMEOUT_US 500U
> +
> #define CCM_DIV_SHIFT 0
> #define CCM_DIV_WIDTH 8
> #define CCM_MUX_SHIFT 8
> #define CCM_MUX_MASK 3
> #define CCM_OFF_SHIFT 24
> +#define CCM_BUSY_SHIFT 28
>
> +#define STAT_OFFSET 0x4
> #define AUTHEN_OFFSET 0x30
> #define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
> #define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)
>
> +static int imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(struct clk_hw *hw, void __iomem *reg)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(reg + STAT_OFFSET, val, !(val & BIT(CCM_BUSY_SHIFT)),
> + 0, TIMEOUT_US);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("Slice[%s] busy timeout\n", clk_hw_get_name(hw));
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void imx93_clk_composite_gate_endisable(struct clk_hw *hw, int enable)
> +{
> + struct clk_gate *gate = to_clk_gate(hw);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + if (gate->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> +
> + reg = readl(gate->reg);
> +
> + if (enable)
> + reg &= ~BIT(gate->bit_idx);
> + else
> + reg |= BIT(gate->bit_idx);
> +
> + writel(reg, gate->reg);
> +
> + imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(hw, gate->reg);
> +
> + if (gate->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx93_clk_composite_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + imx93_clk_composite_gate_endisable(hw, 1);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void imx93_clk_composite_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + imx93_clk_composite_gate_endisable(hw, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_gate_ops = {
> + .enable = imx93_clk_composite_gate_enable,
> + .disable = imx93_clk_composite_gate_disable,
> + .is_enabled = clk_gate_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned long
> +imx93_clk_composite_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + return clk_divider_ops.recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static long
> +imx93_clk_composite_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> + return clk_divider_ops.round_rate(hw, rate, prate);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +imx93_clk_composite_divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + return clk_divider_ops.determine_rate(hw, req);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx93_clk_composite_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw);
> + int value;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + value = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, divider->table, divider->width, divider->flags);
> + if (value < 0)
> + return value;
> +
> + if (divider->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags);
> +
> + val = readl(divider->reg);
> + val &= ~(clk_div_mask(divider->width) << divider->shift);
> + val |= (u32)value << divider->shift;
> + writel(val, divider->reg);
> +
> + ret = imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(hw, divider->reg);
> +
> + if (divider->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(divider->lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_divider_ops = {
> + .recalc_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_recalc_rate,
> + .round_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_round_rate,
> + .determine_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_determine_rate,
> + .set_rate = imx93_clk_composite_divider_set_rate,
> +};
> +
> +static u8 imx93_clk_composite_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + return clk_mux_ops.get_parent(hw);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx93_clk_composite_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> + struct clk_mux *mux = to_clk_mux(hw);
> + u32 val = clk_mux_index_to_val(mux->table, mux->flags, index);
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> + u32 reg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_lock_irqsave(mux->lock, flags);
> +
> + reg = readl(mux->reg);
> + reg &= ~(mux->mask << mux->shift);
> + val = val << mux->shift;
> + reg |= val;
> + writel(reg, mux->reg);
> +
> + ret = imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(hw, mux->reg);
> +
> + if (mux->lock)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(mux->lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +imx93_clk_composite_mux_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + return clk_mux_ops.determine_rate(hw, req);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_mux_ops = {
> + .get_parent = imx93_clk_composite_mux_get_parent,
> + .set_parent = imx93_clk_composite_mux_set_parent,
> + .determine_rate = imx93_clk_composite_mux_determine_rate,
> +};
> +
> struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *parent_names,
> int num_parents, void __iomem *reg,
> unsigned long flags)
> @@ -74,9 +230,10 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *p
> gate->flags = CLK_GATE_SET_TO_DISABLE;
>
> hw = clk_hw_register_composite(NULL, name, parent_names, num_parents,
> - mux_hw, &clk_mux_ops, div_hw,
> - &clk_divider_ops, gate_hw,
> - &clk_gate_ops, flags | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT);
> + mux_hw, &imx93_clk_composite_mux_ops, div_hw,
> + &imx93_clk_composite_divider_ops, gate_hw,
> + &imx93_clk_composite_gate_ops,
> + flags | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT);
> }
>
> if (IS_ERR(hw))
> --
> 2.37.1
>

2022-08-15 09:03:46

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/8] clk: imx: clk-composite-93: check white_list

On 22-08-15 09:30:35, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> The CCM ROOT AUTHEN register WHITE_LIST indicate:
> Each bit in this field represent for one domain. Bit16~Bit31 represent
> for DOMAIN0~DOMAIN15 respectively. Only corresponding bit of the domains
> is set to 1 can change the registers of this Clock Root.
>
> i.MX93 DID is 3, so if BIT(3 + WHITE_LIST_SHIFT) is 0, the clk should be
> set to read only. To make the imx93_clk_composite_flags be reusable,
> add a new parameter named did(domain id);
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> index 19f4037e6cca..74a66b0203e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-93.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
> #define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
> #define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)
>
> +#define WHITE_LIST_SHIFT 16
> +
> static int imx93_clk_composite_wait_ready(struct clk_hw *hw, void __iomem *reg)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -180,7 +182,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_composite_mux_ops = {
> };
>
> struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *parent_names,
> - int num_parents, void __iomem *reg,
> + int num_parents, void __iomem *reg, u32 domain_id,
> unsigned long flags)
> {
> struct clk_hw *hw = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM), *mux_hw;
> @@ -189,6 +191,7 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *p
> struct clk_gate *gate = NULL;
> struct clk_mux *mux = NULL;
> bool clk_ro = false;
> + u32 authen;
>
> mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mux)
> @@ -211,7 +214,8 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name, const char * const *p
> div->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
> div->flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST;
>
> - if (!(readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET) & TZ_NS_MASK))
> + authen = readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
> + if (!(authen & TZ_NS_MASK) || !(authen & BIT(WHITE_LIST_SHIFT + domain_id)))
> clk_ro = true;
>
> if (clk_ro) {
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> index 5099048b7916..0d5c11bb3659 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int imx93_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> root = &root_array[i];
> clks[root->clk] = imx93_clk_composite_flags(root->name,
> parent_names[root->sel],
> - 4, base + root->off,
> + 4, base + root->off, 3,
> root->flags);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> index 5061a06468df..396a5ea75083 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> @@ -445,9 +445,10 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name,
> const char * const *parent_names,
> int num_parents,
> void __iomem *reg,
> + u32 domain_id,
> unsigned long flags);
> -#define imx93_clk_composite(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg) \
> - imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, \
> +#define imx93_clk_composite(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, domain_id) \
> + imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, domain_id \
> CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
>
> struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_divider_gate(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> --
> 2.37.1
>

2022-08-15 09:09:59

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/8] clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk gate

On 22-08-15 09:30:36, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> i.MX93 LPCG is different from i.MX8M CCGR. Although imx_clk_hw_gate4_flags
> is used here, it not strictly match i.MX93. i.MX93 has such design:
> - LPCG_DIRECT use BIT0 as on/off gate when LPCG_AUTHEN CPU_LPM is 0
> - LPCG_LPM_CUR use BIT[2:0] as on/off gate when LPCG_AUTHEN CPU_LPM is 1
>
> The current implementation suppose CPU_LPM is 0, and use LPCG_DIRECT
> BIT[1:0] as on/off gate. Although BIT1 is touched, actually BIT1 is
> reserved.
>
> And imx_clk_hw_gate4_flags use mask 0x3 to determine whether the clk
> is enabled or not, but i.MX93 LPCG only use BIT0 to control when CPU_LPM
> is 0. So clk disabled unused during kernel boot not able to gate off
> the unused clocks.
>
> To match i.MX93 LPCG, introduce imx93_clk_gate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> index 88b9b9285d22..89fe72327788 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MN) += clk-imx8mn.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MP) += clk-imx8mp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX93) += clk-imx93.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX93) += clk-imx93.o clk-gate-93.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += clk-imx-scu.o clk-imx-lpcg-scu.o
> clk-imx-scu-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8QXP) += clk-scu.o clk-imx8qxp.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ceb56b290394
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2022 NXP
> + *
> + * Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "clk.h"
> +
> +#define DIRECT_OFFSET 0x0
> +
> +/*
> + * 0b000 - LPCG will be OFF in any CPU mode.
> + * 0b100 - LPCG will be ON in any CPU mode.
> + */
> +#define LPM_SETTING_OFF 0x0
> +#define LPM_SETTING_ON 0x4
> +
> +#define LPM_CUR_OFFSET 0x1c
> +
> +#define AUTHEN_OFFSET 0x30
> +#define CPULPM_EN BIT(2)
> +#define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
> +#define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)
> +
> +#define WHITE_LIST_SHIFT 16
> +
> +struct imx93_clk_gate {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> + u32 bit_idx;
> + u32 val;
> + u32 mask;
> + spinlock_t *lock;
> + unsigned int *share_count;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_imx93_clk_gate(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct imx93_clk_gate, hw)
> +
> +static void imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(struct clk_hw *hw, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl(gate->reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
> + if (val & CPULPM_EN) {
> + val = enable ? LPM_SETTING_ON : LPM_SETTING_OFF;
> + writel(val, gate->reg + LPM_CUR_OFFSET);
> + } else {
> + val = readl(gate->reg + DIRECT_OFFSET);
> + val &= ~(gate->mask << gate->bit_idx);
> + if (enable)
> + val |= (gate->val & gate->mask) << gate->bit_idx;
> + writel(val, gate->reg + DIRECT_OFFSET);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int imx93_clk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (gate->share_count && (*gate->share_count)++ > 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, true);
> +out:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}

Just wondering if we could use the existing clk-gate2 since we would
only have to implement the ops that are different there.

Also, would the next i.MX9 platforms also use this? Or will we have one
similar driver for each new platform?

> +
> +static void imx93_clk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (gate->share_count) {
> + if (WARN_ON(*gate->share_count == 0))
> + goto out;
> + else if (--(*gate->share_count) > 0)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, false);
> +out:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int imx93_clk_gate_reg_is_enabled(struct imx93_clk_gate *gate)
> +{
> + u32 val = readl(gate->reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
> +
> + if (val & CPULPM_EN) {
> + val = readl(gate->reg + LPM_CUR_OFFSET);
> + if (val == LPM_SETTING_ON)
> + return 1;
> + } else {
> + val = readl(gate->reg);
> + if (((val >> gate->bit_idx) & gate->mask) == gate->val)
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> +
> + ret = imx93_clk_gate_reg_is_enabled(gate);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void imx93_clk_gate_disable_unused(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (!gate->share_count || *gate->share_count == 0)
> + imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, false);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_gate_ops = {
> + .enable = imx93_clk_gate_enable,
> + .disable = imx93_clk_gate_disable,
> + .disable_unused = imx93_clk_gate_disable_unused,
> + .is_enabled = imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_gate_ro_ops = {
> + .is_enabled = imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> + unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u32 bit_idx, u32 val,
> + u32 mask, u32 domain_id, unsigned int *share_count)
> +{
> + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate;
> + struct clk_hw *hw;
> + struct clk_init_data init;
> + int ret;
> + u32 authen;
> +
> + gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct imx93_clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!gate)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + gate->reg = reg;
> + gate->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
> + gate->bit_idx = bit_idx;
> + gate->val = val;
> + gate->mask = mask;
> + gate->share_count = share_count;
> +
> + init.name = name;
> + init.ops = &imx93_clk_gate_ops;
> + init.flags = flags | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE;
> + init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL;
> + init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0;
> +
> + gate->hw.init = &init;
> + hw = &gate->hw;
> +
> + authen = readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
> + if (!(authen & TZ_NS_MASK) || !(authen & BIT(WHITE_LIST_SHIFT + domain_id)))
> + init.ops = &imx93_clk_gate_ro_ops;
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(gate);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> +
> + return hw;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(imx93_clk_gate);
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> index 396a5ea75083..dd49f90110e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> @@ -451,6 +451,10 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const char *name,
> imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents, reg, domain_id \
> CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
>
> +struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> + unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u32 bit_idx, u32 val,
> + u32 mask, u32 domain_id, unsigned int *share_count);
> +
> struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_divider_gate(const char *name, const char *parent_name,
> unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u8 width,
> u8 clk_divider_flags, const struct clk_div_table *table,
> --
> 2.37.1
>

2022-08-15 09:44:55

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 8/8] clk: imx93: add SAI IPG clk

On 22-08-15 09:30:39, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> The clk topology is as below:
> bus_aon_root------>\ /--->SAI IPG
> -->SAI LPCG gate-->
> sai[x]_clk_root--->/ \--->SAI MCLK
>
> So use shared count as i.MX93 MU_B gate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> index 4008ab075dfe..6a76b9fdf18d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ enum clk_sel {
> MAX_SEL
> };
>
> +static u32 share_count_sai1;
> +static u32 share_count_sai2;
> +static u32 share_count_sai3;
> static u32 share_count_mub;
>
> static const char *parent_names[MAX_SEL][4] = {
> @@ -215,9 +218,12 @@ static const struct imx93_clk_ccgr {
> { IMX93_CLK_USDHC1_GATE, "usdhc1", "usdhc1_root", 0x9380, },
> { IMX93_CLK_USDHC2_GATE, "usdhc2", "usdhc2_root", 0x93c0, },
> { IMX93_CLK_USDHC3_GATE, "usdhc3", "usdhc3_root", 0x9400, },
> - { IMX93_CLK_SAI1_GATE, "sai1", "sai1_root", 0x9440, },
> - { IMX93_CLK_SAI2_GATE, "sai2", "sai2_root", 0x9480, },
> - { IMX93_CLK_SAI3_GATE, "sai3", "sai3_root", 0x94c0, },
> + { IMX93_CLK_SAI1_GATE, "sai1", "sai1_root", 0x9440, 0, &share_count_sai1},
> + { IMX93_CLK_SAI1_IPG, "sai1_ipg_clk", "bus_aon_root", 0x9440, 0, &share_count_sai1},
> + { IMX93_CLK_SAI2_GATE, "sai2", "sai2_root", 0x9480, 0, &share_count_sai2},
> + { IMX93_CLK_SAI2_IPG, "sai2_ipg_clk", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x9480, 0, &share_count_sai2},
> + { IMX93_CLK_SAI3_GATE, "sai3", "sai3_root", 0x94c0, 0, &share_count_sai3},
> + { IMX93_CLK_SAI3_IPG, "sai3_ipg_clk", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x94c0, 0, &share_count_sai3},
> { IMX93_CLK_MIPI_CSI_GATE, "mipi_csi", "media_apb_root", 0x9580, },
> { IMX93_CLK_MIPI_DSI_GATE, "mipi_dsi", "media_apb_root", 0x95c0, },
> { IMX93_CLK_LVDS_GATE, "lvds", "media_ldb_root", 0x9600, },
> --
> 2.37.1
>

2022-08-15 09:47:15

by Peng Fan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 5/8] clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk gate

Hi Abel,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/8] clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk gate
>
> On 22-08-15 09:30:36, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> >
> > i.MX93 LPCG is different from i.MX8M CCGR. Although
> > imx_clk_hw_gate4_flags is used here, it not strictly match i.MX93. i.MX93
> has such design:
> > - LPCG_DIRECT use BIT0 as on/off gate when LPCG_AUTHEN CPU_LPM is 0
> > - LPCG_LPM_CUR use BIT[2:0] as on/off gate when LPCG_AUTHEN
> CPU_LPM
> > is 1
> >
> > The current implementation suppose CPU_LPM is 0, and use LPCG_DIRECT
> > BIT[1:0] as on/off gate. Although BIT1 is touched, actually BIT1 is
> > reserved.
> >
> > And imx_clk_hw_gate4_flags use mask 0x3 to determine whether the clk
> > is enabled or not, but i.MX93 LPCG only use BIT0 to control when
> > CPU_LPM is 0. So clk disabled unused during kernel boot not able to
> > gate off the unused clocks.
> >
> > To match i.MX93 LPCG, introduce imx93_clk_gate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c | 199
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 4 +
> > 3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644
> > drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile index
> > 88b9b9285d22..89fe72327788 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MN) += clk-imx8mn.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MP) += clk-imx8mp.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o
> >
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX93) += clk-imx93.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX93) += clk-imx93.o clk-gate-93.o
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += clk-imx-scu.o clk-imx-lpcg-scu.o
> > clk-imx-scu-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8QXP) += clk-scu.o clk-imx8qxp.o \ diff
> > --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
> > new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ceb56b290394
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-gate-93.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2022 NXP
> > + *
> > + * Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +#include "clk.h"
> > +
> > +#define DIRECT_OFFSET 0x0
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * 0b000 - LPCG will be OFF in any CPU mode.
> > + * 0b100 - LPCG will be ON in any CPU mode.
> > + */
> > +#define LPM_SETTING_OFF 0x0
> > +#define LPM_SETTING_ON 0x4
> > +
> > +#define LPM_CUR_OFFSET 0x1c
> > +
> > +#define AUTHEN_OFFSET 0x30
> > +#define CPULPM_EN BIT(2)
> > +#define TZ_NS_SHIFT 9
> > +#define TZ_NS_MASK BIT(9)
> > +
> > +#define WHITE_LIST_SHIFT 16
> > +
> > +struct imx93_clk_gate {
> > + struct clk_hw hw;
> > + void __iomem *reg;
> > + u32 bit_idx;
> > + u32 val;
> > + u32 mask;
> > + spinlock_t *lock;
> > + unsigned int *share_count;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define to_imx93_clk_gate(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct
> > +imx93_clk_gate, hw)
> > +
> > +static void imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(struct clk_hw *hw, bool
> > +enable) {
> > + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = readl(gate->reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
> > + if (val & CPULPM_EN) {
> > + val = enable ? LPM_SETTING_ON : LPM_SETTING_OFF;
> > + writel(val, gate->reg + LPM_CUR_OFFSET);
> > + } else {
> > + val = readl(gate->reg + DIRECT_OFFSET);
> > + val &= ~(gate->mask << gate->bit_idx);
> > + if (enable)
> > + val |= (gate->val & gate->mask) << gate->bit_idx;
> > + writel(val, gate->reg + DIRECT_OFFSET);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int imx93_clk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) {
> > + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (gate->share_count && (*gate->share_count)++ > 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, true);
> > +out:
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Just wondering if we could use the existing clk-gate2 since we would only
> have to implement the ops that are different there.
>

I thought about this, but i.MX9 LPCG gate has a different design, it is
not i.MX8M CCGR gate. Although the first version of the i.MX93 clk
driver use clk-gate2, but it could not support i.MX93 well.

You could see i.MX93 gate API use different input parameters.

Clk-gate2 not support LPM(low power mode), AUTHEN(authentication),
WHITE_LIST(domain control list).

i.MX93 LPCG has two working modes, DIRECT mode, LPM mode.
DIRECT mode is a 1 bit control bit if LPM is not enabled.
If LPM enabled, LPCG use a similar way as CCGR domain bits

> Also, would the next i.MX9 platforms also use this? Or will we have one
> similar driver for each new platform?

i.MX9 series use same LPCG design per my understanding. I hope
there are no big changes in hardware in future, so we could reuse
same driver.

Thanks,
Peng.
>
> > +
> > +static void imx93_clk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) {
> > + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (gate->share_count) {
> > + if (WARN_ON(*gate->share_count == 0))
> > + goto out;
> > + else if (--(*gate->share_count) > 0)
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, false);
> > +out:
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags); }
> > +
> > +static int imx93_clk_gate_reg_is_enabled(struct imx93_clk_gate *gate)
> > +{
> > + u32 val = readl(gate->reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
> > +
> > + if (val & CPULPM_EN) {
> > + val = readl(gate->reg + LPM_CUR_OFFSET);
> > + if (val == LPM_SETTING_ON)
> > + return 1;
> > + } else {
> > + val = readl(gate->reg);
> > + if (((val >> gate->bit_idx) & gate->mask) == gate->val)
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw) {
> > + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + ret = imx93_clk_gate_reg_is_enabled(gate);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void imx93_clk_gate_disable_unused(struct clk_hw *hw) {
> > + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate = to_imx93_clk_gate(hw);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(gate->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (!gate->share_count || *gate->share_count == 0)
> > + imx93_clk_gate_do_hardware(hw, false);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags); }
> > +
> > +static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_gate_ops = {
> > + .enable = imx93_clk_gate_enable,
> > + .disable = imx93_clk_gate_disable,
> > + .disable_unused = imx93_clk_gate_disable_unused,
> > + .is_enabled = imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled, };
> > +
> > +static const struct clk_ops imx93_clk_gate_ro_ops = {
> > + .is_enabled = imx93_clk_gate_is_enabled, };
> > +
> > +struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> const char *parent_name,
> > + unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u32
> bit_idx, u32 val,
> > + u32 mask, u32 domain_id, unsigned int
> *share_count) {
> > + struct imx93_clk_gate *gate;
> > + struct clk_hw *hw;
> > + struct clk_init_data init;
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 authen;
> > +
> > + gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct imx93_clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!gate)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + gate->reg = reg;
> > + gate->lock = &imx_ccm_lock;
> > + gate->bit_idx = bit_idx;
> > + gate->val = val;
> > + gate->mask = mask;
> > + gate->share_count = share_count;
> > +
> > + init.name = name;
> > + init.ops = &imx93_clk_gate_ops;
> > + init.flags = flags | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
> CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE;
> > + init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL;
> > + init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0;
> > +
> > + gate->hw.init = &init;
> > + hw = &gate->hw;
> > +
> > + authen = readl(reg + AUTHEN_OFFSET);
> > + if (!(authen & TZ_NS_MASK) || !(authen & BIT(WHITE_LIST_SHIFT +
> domain_id)))
> > + init.ops = &imx93_clk_gate_ro_ops;
> > +
> > + ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + kfree(gate);
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return hw;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(imx93_clk_gate);
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h index
> > 396a5ea75083..dd49f90110e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.h
> > @@ -451,6 +451,10 @@ struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_composite_flags(const
> char *name,
> > imx93_clk_composite_flags(name, parent_names, num_parents,
> reg, domain_id \
> > CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT |
> CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> >
> > +struct clk_hw *imx93_clk_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> const char *parent_name,
> > + unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u32
> bit_idx, u32 val,
> > + u32 mask, u32 domain_id, unsigned int
> *share_count);
> > +
> > struct clk_hw *imx_clk_hw_divider_gate(const char *name, const char
> *parent_name,
> > unsigned long flags, void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u8 width,
> > u8 clk_divider_flags, const struct clk_div_table *table,
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >

2022-08-15 09:55:17

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] clk: imx93: add MU1/2 clock

On 22-08-15 09:30:38, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
>
> The clk tree should be as:
> bus_aon_root------>\ /--->MU1_B IP
> -->MU_B gate-->
> bus_wakeup_root--->/ \--->MU2_B IP
>
> bus_aon_root------>\ /--->MU1_A IP
> -->MU_A gate-->
> bus_wakeup_root--->/ \--->MU2_A IP
>
> So need use shared count gate. And linux use MU_B,
> so set MU_A clk as CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jacky Bai <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> index 73d30a2e64b0..4008ab075dfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ enum clk_sel {
> MAX_SEL
> };
>
> +static u32 share_count_mub;
> +
> static const char *parent_names[MAX_SEL][4] = {
> {"osc_24m", "sys_pll_pfd0_div2", "sys_pll_pfd1_div2", "video_pll"},
> {"osc_24m", "sys_pll_pfd0_div2", "sys_pll_pfd1_div2", "sys_pll_pfd2_div2"},
> @@ -159,8 +161,10 @@ static const struct imx93_clk_ccgr {
> { IMX93_CLK_WDOG5_GATE, "wdog5", "osc_24m", 0x8400, },
> { IMX93_CLK_SEMA1_GATE, "sema1", "bus_aon_root", 0x8440, },
> { IMX93_CLK_SEMA2_GATE, "sema2", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x8480, },
> - { IMX93_CLK_MU_A_GATE, "mu_a", "bus_aon_root", 0x84c0, },
> - { IMX93_CLK_MU_B_GATE, "mu_b", "bus_aon_root", 0x8500, },
> + { IMX93_CLK_MU1_A_GATE, "mu1_a", "bus_aon_root", 0x84c0, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
> + { IMX93_CLK_MU2_A_GATE, "mu2_a", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x84c0, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
> + { IMX93_CLK_MU1_B_GATE, "mu1_b", "bus_aon_root", 0x8500, 0, &share_count_mub },
> + { IMX93_CLK_MU2_B_GATE, "mu2_b", "bus_wakeup_root", 0x8500, 0, &share_count_mub },
> { IMX93_CLK_EDMA1_GATE, "edma1", "m33_root", 0x8540, },
> { IMX93_CLK_EDMA2_GATE, "edma2", "wakeup_axi_root", 0x8580, },
> { IMX93_CLK_FLEXSPI1_GATE, "flexspi", "flexspi_root", 0x8640, },
> --
> 2.37.1
>