Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
be bumped accordingly.
Also use ksft_finish to print results and exit. This will catch future
mismatches between ksft_set_plan and the number of tests being run.
Fixes: 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
index 4fce46afe6db..7b45c9854202 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
uid_t uid = getuid();
ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(17);
+ ksft_set_plan(18);
test_clone3_supported();
/* Just a simple clone3() should return 0.*/
--
2.39.1
Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
be bumped accordingly.
Also use ksft_finished() to print results and exit. This will catch future
mismatches between ksft_set_plan() and the number of tests being run.
Fixes: 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
---
v2:
- actually added ksft_finished call as mentioned in the commit message
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
index 4fce46afe6db..e495f895a2cd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
uid_t uid = getuid();
ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(17);
+ ksft_set_plan(18);
test_clone3_supported();
/* Just a simple clone3() should return 0.*/
@@ -198,5 +198,5 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Do a clone3() in a new time namespace */
test_clone3(CLONE_NEWTIME, 0, 0, CLONE3_ARGS_NO_TEST);
- return !ksft_get_fail_cnt() ? ksft_exit_pass() : ksft_exit_fail();
+ ksft_finished();
}
--
2.39.1
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
> be bumped accordingly.
>
> Also use ksft_finished() to print results and exit. This will catch future
> mismatches between ksft_set_plan() and the number of tests being run.
>
> Fixes: 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
> ---
Looks good. Thanks for fixing this,
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Feel free to take this through the selftests tree, Shuah.
On 2023-03-14 at 14:09:59 +0100, Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
> > be bumped accordingly.
> >
> > Also use ksft_finished() to print results and exit. This will catch future
> > mismatches between ksft_set_plan() and the number of tests being run.
> >
> > Fixes: 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Looks good. Thanks for fixing this,
> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
>
> Feel free to take this through the selftests tree, Shuah.
It looks like this hasn't made it into Linus' tree yet and I also don't
see it in Shuah's tree. Would it be possible to still submit this for
6.3-rc6 given the commit it fixes has made it to Linus' tree already?
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 10:57:37PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> On 2023-03-14 at 14:09:59 +0100, Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > > Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > > added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
> > > be bumped accordingly.
> > >
> > > Also use ksft_finished() to print results and exit. This will catch future
> > > mismatches between ksft_set_plan() and the number of tests being run.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > > Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> >
> > Looks good. Thanks for fixing this,
> > Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> >
> > Feel free to take this through the selftests tree, Shuah.
>
> It looks like this hasn't made it into Linus' tree yet and I also don't
> see it in Shuah's tree. Would it be possible to still submit this for
> 6.3-rc6 given the commit it fixes has made it to Linus' tree already?
Is it in linux-next?
On 2023-04-05 at 09:46:11 +0200, Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 10:57:37PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > On 2023-03-14 at 14:09:59 +0100, Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > > > Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > > > added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
> > > > be bumped accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > Also use ksft_finished() to print results and exit. This will catch future
> > > > mismatches between ksft_set_plan() and the number of tests being run.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> > > > Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Looks good. Thanks for fixing this,
> > > Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Feel free to take this through the selftests tree, Shuah.
> >
> > It looks like this hasn't made it into Linus' tree yet and I also don't
> > see it in Shuah's tree. Would it be possible to still submit this for
> > 6.3-rc6 given the commit it fixes has made it to Linus' tree already?
>
> Is it in linux-next?
No, doesn't look like it (I checked on tags/next-20230405).
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:34:14 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Commit 515bddf0ec41 ("selftests/clone3: test clone3 with CLONE_NEWTIME")
> added an additional test, so the number passed to ksft_set_plan needs to
> be bumped accordingly.
>
> Also use ksft_finished() to print results and exit. This will catch future
> mismatches between ksft_set_plan() and the number of tests being run.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git
branch: kernel.fork
[1/1] selftests/clone3: fix number of tests in ksft_set_plan
commit: d95debbdc528d50042807754d6085c15abc21768
I'm happy to drop it in case this is later picked up by the selftest tree.