dtbs_check w/ W=1 complains:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/ethernet@11c20000/ethernet-phy@7: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/ethernet@11c20000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
The ethernet@11c20000 node is guarded by an `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` in
rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi, where the phy child node is added. In
rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi, the ethernet node is marked disabled & the
interrupt properties are deleted from the phy child node. As a result,
the produced dts looks like:
ethernet@11c20000 {
compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
/* snip */
#address-cells = <0x01>;
#size-cells = <0x00>;
status = "disabled";
ethernet-phy@7 {
};
};
Adding a corresponding `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` around the node in
rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi avoids the complaint, as the empty child node is
not added:
ethernet@11c20000 {
compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
/* snip */
#address-cells = <0x01>;
#size-cells = <0x00>;
status = "disabled";
};
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
---
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
CC: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
CC: Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <[email protected]>
CC: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
CC: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
---
arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
index d6f18754eb5d..c62debc7ca7e 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ &dmac {
status = "disabled";
};
+#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)
ð0 {
status = "disabled";
@@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ phy0: ethernet-phy@7 {
/delete-property/ interrupts;
};
};
+#endif
ð1 {
status = "disabled";
--
2.40.1
Hello!
On 7/12/23 11:14 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> dtbs_check w/ W=1 complains:
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/ethernet@11c20000/ethernet-phy@7: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/ethernet@11c20000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>
> The ethernet@11c20000 node is guarded by an `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` in
> rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi, where the phy child node is added. In
> rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi, the ethernet node is marked disabled & the
> interrupt properties are deleted from the phy child node. As a result,
> the produced dts looks like:
> ethernet@11c20000 {
> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> /* snip */
> #address-cells = <0x01>;
> #size-cells = <0x00>;
> status = "disabled";
>
> ethernet-phy@7 {
> };
> };
>
> Adding a corresponding `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` around the node in
> rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi avoids the complaint, as the empty child node is
> not added:
> ethernet@11c20000 {
> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> /* snip */
> #address-cells = <0x01>;
> #size-cells = <0x00>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> index d6f18754eb5d..c62debc7ca7e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ &dmac {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> +#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)
Are the parens really needed here?
> ð0 {
> status = "disabled";
>
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Hi Sergei.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:43 AM Sergei Shtylyov
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/12/23 11:14 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> > dtbs_check w/ W=1 complains:
> > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/ethernet@11c20000/ethernet-phy@7: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> > Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/ethernet@11c20000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
> >
> > The ethernet@11c20000 node is guarded by an `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` in
> > rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi, where the phy child node is added. In
> > rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi, the ethernet node is marked disabled & the
> > interrupt properties are deleted from the phy child node. As a result,
> > the produced dts looks like:
> > ethernet@11c20000 {
> > compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> > /* snip */
> > #address-cells = <0x01>;
> > #size-cells = <0x00>;
> > status = "disabled";
> >
> > ethernet-phy@7 {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > Adding a corresponding `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` around the node in
> > rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi avoids the complaint, as the empty child node is
> > not added:
> > ethernet@11c20000 {
> > compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> > /* snip */
> > #address-cells = <0x01>;
> > #size-cells = <0x00>;
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> > index d6f18754eb5d..c62debc7ca7e 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ &dmac {
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > +#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)
>
> Are the parens really needed here?
No they aren't. But this follows the existing style of the other users.
>
> > ð0 {
> > status = "disabled";
> >
> [...]
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:15 AM Conor Dooley
<[email protected]> wrote:
> dtbs_check w/ W=1 complains:
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/ethernet@11c20000/ethernet-phy@7: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/ethernet@11c20000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>
> The ethernet@11c20000 node is guarded by an `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` in
> rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi, where the phy child node is added. In
> rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi, the ethernet node is marked disabled & the
> interrupt properties are deleted from the phy child node. As a result,
> the produced dts looks like:
> ethernet@11c20000 {
> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> /* snip */
> #address-cells = <0x01>;
> #size-cells = <0x00>;
> status = "disabled";
>
> ethernet-phy@7 {
> };
> };
>
> Adding a corresponding `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` around the node in
> rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi avoids the complaint, as the empty child node is
> not added:
> ethernet@11c20000 {
> compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> /* snip */
> #address-cells = <0x01>;
> #size-cells = <0x00>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
i.e. will queue in renesas-devel for v6.6.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds