2023-07-12 07:12:23

by Yang Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
appropriate error message in case of a failure.

./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <[email protected]>
---
drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
index 786b1469eb52..b499eade957e 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
@@ -861,7 +861,6 @@ static void ufs_mtk_init_mcq_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba)
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1);
if (irq < 0) {
host->mcq_intr_info[i].irq = MTK_MCQ_INVALID_IRQ;
- dev_err(hba->dev, "get platform mcq irq fail: %d\n", i);
goto failed;
}
host->mcq_intr_info[i].hba = hba;
--
2.20.1.7.g153144c



Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

Il 12/07/23 08:48, Yang Li ha scritto:
> There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> appropriate error message in case of a failure.
>
> ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>



2023-07-13 13:20:58

by Sudeep Holla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:48:32PM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> appropriate error message in case of a failure.
>
> ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>

--
Regards,
Sudeep

2023-07-13 13:37:40

by Sudeep Holla

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:48:32PM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> > There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> > custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> > or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> > appropriate error message in case of a failure.
> >
> > ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
> >
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
>

Sorry for this, I didn't mean to ack this patch, no idea how on earth I
managed to do that (must be some wrong key combination in my email client)
but I wanted and meant to ack only this [1]. Sorry for the noise.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

2023-07-23 20:08:16

by Martin K. Petersen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()


Yang,

> There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> appropriate error message in case of a failure.

Applied to 6.6/scsi-staging, thanks!

--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering