From: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Hi All,
The IAX45 block on RZ/Five SoC is almost identical to the IRQC bock found
on the RZ/G2L family of SoCs.
IAX45 performs various interrupt controls including synchronization for the
external interrupts of NMI, IRQ, and GPIOINT and the interrupts of the
built-in peripheral interrupts output by each module. And it notifies the
interrupt to the PLIC.
- Select 32 TINT from 82 GPIOINT.
- Integration of bus error interrupts from system bus.
- Integration of ECC error interrupts from On-chip RAM.
- Indicate interrupt status. (NMI, IRQ, TINT, integrated bus error
interrupt and integrated ECC error interrupt)
- Setting of interrupt detection method. (NMI, IRQ and TINT)
- All interrupts are masked by INTMASK.
- Mask function for NMI, IRQ and TINT
This patch series adds support for IAX45 in the IRQC driver and enables
this on RZ/Five SoC.
v3->v4
- Renamed rzg2l_irqc_init_helper -> rzg2l_irqc_common_init
- Moved the locks into callers for (un)mask and (en/dis)able functions
- Collected RB tag from Geert for patch#2
v2->v3
- DTS/I patches dropped from the series as they have been merged into
renesas-soc tree
- Just using a const from compat string instead of having it in a items
- Added RZ/Five specific irqchip
v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/cover/[email protected]/
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/cover/[email protected]/
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Lad Prabhakar (2):
dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: renesas,rzg2l-irqc: Document
RZ/Five SoC
irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/Five SoC
.../renesas,rzg2l-irqc.yaml | 17 +-
drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
From: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Document RZ/Five (R9A07G043F) IRQC bindings. The IRQC block on the RZ/Five
SoC is almost identical to the one found on the RZ/G2L SoC, with the only
difference being that it has additional mask control registers for
NMI/IRQ/TINT.
Hence new compatible string "renesas,r9a07g043f-irqc" is added for RZ/Five
SoC.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
---
v3->v4
- No change
v2->v3
- Dropped items for rz/five
- Collected the RB tags
v1->v2
- Dropped the checks for interrupts as its already handled
- Added SoC specific compat string
---
.../renesas,rzg2l-irqc.yaml | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rzg2l-irqc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rzg2l-irqc.yaml
index daef4ee06f4e..44b6ae5fc802 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rzg2l-irqc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rzg2l-irqc.yaml
@@ -21,13 +21,16 @@ description: |
properties:
compatible:
- items:
- - enum:
- - renesas,r9a07g043u-irqc # RZ/G2UL
- - renesas,r9a07g044-irqc # RZ/G2{L,LC}
- - renesas,r9a07g054-irqc # RZ/V2L
- - renesas,r9a08g045-irqc # RZ/G3S
- - const: renesas,rzg2l-irqc
+ oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - renesas,r9a07g043u-irqc # RZ/G2UL
+ - renesas,r9a07g044-irqc # RZ/G2{L,LC}
+ - renesas,r9a07g054-irqc # RZ/V2L
+ - renesas,r9a08g045-irqc # RZ/G3S
+ - const: renesas,rzg2l-irqc
+
+ - const: renesas,r9a07g043f-irqc # RZ/Five
'#interrupt-cells':
description: The first cell should contain a macro RZG2L_{NMI,IRQX} included in the
--
2.34.1
From: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
The IX45 block has additional mask registers (NMSK/IMSK/TMSK) compared
to the RZ/G2L (family) SoC.
A new rzfive_irqc_chip irq_chip is introduced for RZ/Five, where function
pointers for irq_(un)mask and irq_(dis/en)able handle the (un)masking
of the interrupts. The irq_chip pointer is now passed as an init callback
and stored in the priv pointer to differentiate between RZ/G2L and RZ/Five.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
---
v3->v4
- Renamed rzg2l_irqc_init_helper -> rzg2l_irqc_common_init
- Moved the locks into callers for (un)mask and (en/dis)able functions
- Collected RB tag from Geert
v2->v3
- Added RZ/Five specific irqchip instead of polluting the functions
- Fixed review comments pointed by Biju and Geert
- Updated commit message
- moved locking to respective read/write functions
v1->v2
- Added IRQCHIP_MATCH() for RZ/Five
- Retaining a copy of OF data in priv
- Rebased the changes
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 145 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
index f6484bf15e0b..98a6a339fe43 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
#define TSSEL_SHIFT(n) (8 * (n))
#define TSSEL_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
#define IRQ_MASK 0x3
+#define IMSK 0x10010
+#define TMSK 0x10020
#define TSSR_OFFSET(n) ((n) % 4)
#define TSSR_INDEX(n) ((n) / 4)
@@ -69,12 +71,14 @@ struct rzg2l_irqc_reg_cache {
/**
* struct rzg2l_irqc_priv - IRQ controller private data structure
* @base: Controller's base address
+ * @irqchip: Pointer to struct irq_chip
* @fwspec: IRQ firmware specific data
* @lock: Lock to serialize access to hardware registers
* @cache: Registers cache for suspend/resume
*/
static struct rzg2l_irqc_priv {
void __iomem *base;
+ const struct irq_chip *irqchip;
struct irq_fwspec fwspec[IRQC_NUM_IRQ];
raw_spinlock_t lock;
struct rzg2l_irqc_reg_cache cache;
@@ -138,6 +142,111 @@ static void rzg2l_irqc_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
}
+static void rzfive_irqc_mask_irq_interrupt(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
+ unsigned int hwirq)
+{
+ u32 bit = BIT(hwirq - IRQC_IRQ_START);
+
+ writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(priv->base + IMSK) | bit, priv->base + IMSK);
+}
+
+static void rzfive_irqc_unmask_irq_interrupt(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
+ unsigned int hwirq)
+{
+ u32 bit = BIT(hwirq - IRQC_IRQ_START);
+
+ writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(priv->base + IMSK) & ~bit, priv->base + IMSK);
+}
+
+static void rzfive_irqc_mask_tint_interrupt(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
+ unsigned int hwirq)
+{
+ u32 bit = BIT(hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START);
+
+ writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(priv->base + TMSK) | bit, priv->base + TMSK);
+}
+
+static void rzfive_irqc_unmask_tint_interrupt(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
+ unsigned int hwirq)
+{
+ u32 bit = BIT(hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START);
+
+ writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(priv->base + TMSK) & ~bit, priv->base + TMSK);
+}
+
+static void rzfive_irqc_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
+ unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&priv->lock);
+ if (hwirq >= IRQC_IRQ_START && hwirq <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)
+ rzfive_irqc_mask_irq_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ else if (hwirq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hwirq < IRQC_NUM_IRQ)
+ rzfive_irqc_mask_tint_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
+ irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void rzfive_irqc_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
+ unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&priv->lock);
+ if (hwirq >= IRQC_IRQ_START && hwirq <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)
+ rzfive_irqc_unmask_irq_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ else if (hwirq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hwirq < IRQC_NUM_IRQ)
+ rzfive_irqc_unmask_tint_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
+ irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(struct irq_data *d, bool enable)
+{
+ struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
+ unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+ if (hwirq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hwirq < IRQC_NUM_IRQ) {
+ u32 offset = hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START;
+ u32 tssr_offset = TSSR_OFFSET(offset);
+ u8 tssr_index = TSSR_INDEX(offset);
+ u32 reg;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&priv->lock);
+ if (enable)
+ rzfive_irqc_unmask_tint_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ else
+ rzfive_irqc_mask_tint_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
+ if (enable)
+ reg |= TIEN << TSSEL_SHIFT(tssr_offset);
+ else
+ reg &= ~(TIEN << TSSEL_SHIFT(tssr_offset));
+ writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
+ raw_spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
+ } else {
+ raw_spin_lock(&priv->lock);
+ if (enable)
+ rzfive_irqc_unmask_irq_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ else
+ rzfive_irqc_mask_irq_interrupt(priv, hwirq);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
+ }
+}
+
+static void rzfive_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
+ irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void rzfive_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, true);
+ irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
+}
+
static void rzg2l_tint_irq_endisable(struct irq_data *d, bool enable)
{
unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
@@ -321,7 +430,7 @@ static struct syscore_ops rzg2l_irqc_syscore_ops = {
.resume = rzg2l_irqc_irq_resume,
};
-static const struct irq_chip irqc_chip = {
+static const struct irq_chip rzg2l_irqc_chip = {
.name = "rzg2l-irqc",
.irq_eoi = rzg2l_irqc_eoi,
.irq_mask = irq_chip_mask_parent,
@@ -338,6 +447,23 @@ static const struct irq_chip irqc_chip = {
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
};
+static const struct irq_chip rzfive_irqc_chip = {
+ .name = "rzfive-irqc",
+ .irq_eoi = rzg2l_irqc_eoi,
+ .irq_mask = rzfive_irqc_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = rzfive_irqc_unmask,
+ .irq_disable = rzfive_irqc_irq_disable,
+ .irq_enable = rzfive_irqc_irq_enable,
+ .irq_get_irqchip_state = irq_chip_get_parent_state,
+ .irq_set_irqchip_state = irq_chip_set_parent_state,
+ .irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
+ .irq_set_type = rzg2l_irqc_set_type,
+ .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND |
+ IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED |
+ IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
+};
+
static int rzg2l_irqc_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
{
@@ -369,7 +495,7 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
if (hwirq > (IRQC_NUM_IRQ - 1))
return -EINVAL;
- ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq, &irqc_chip,
+ ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq, priv->irqchip,
(void *)(uintptr_t)tint);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -401,7 +527,8 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_parse_interrupts(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
return 0;
}
-static int rzg2l_irqc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
+static int rzg2l_irqc_common_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent,
+ const struct irq_chip *irq_chip)
{
struct irq_domain *irq_domain, *parent_domain;
struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -422,6 +549,8 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
if (!rzg2l_irqc_data)
return -ENOMEM;
+ rzg2l_irqc_data->irqchip = irq_chip;
+
rzg2l_irqc_data->base = devm_of_iomap(&pdev->dev, pdev->dev.of_node, 0, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(rzg2l_irqc_data->base))
return PTR_ERR(rzg2l_irqc_data->base);
@@ -472,8 +601,21 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
return ret;
}
+static int __init rzg2l_irqc_init(struct device_node *node,
+ struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ return rzg2l_irqc_common_init(node, parent, &rzg2l_irqc_chip);
+}
+
+static int __init rzfive_irqc_init(struct device_node *node,
+ struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ return rzg2l_irqc_common_init(node, parent, &rzfive_irqc_chip);
+}
+
IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_BEGIN(rzg2l_irqc)
IRQCHIP_MATCH("renesas,rzg2l-irqc", rzg2l_irqc_init)
+IRQCHIP_MATCH("renesas,r9a07g043f-irqc", rzfive_irqc_init)
IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_END(rzg2l_irqc)
MODULE_AUTHOR("Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Renesas RZ/G2L IRQC Driver");
--
2.34.1
On Tue, Apr 30 2024 at 15:14, Prabhakar wrote:
> +
> +static void rzfive_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
> + irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void rzfive_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, true);
> + irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
> +}
This looks wrong. Enable/disable should be symmetric vs. ordering, no?
Thanks,
tglx
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for the review.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 1:40 PM Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30 2024 at 15:14, Prabhakar wrote:
> > +
> > +static void rzfive_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, false);
> > + irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rzfive_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + rzfive_tint_irq_endisable(d, true);
> > + irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
> > +}
>
> This looks wrong. Enable/disable should be symmetric vs. ordering, no?
>
Agreed, I will reverse the order in the disable callback and send a new version.
Cheers,
Prabhakar