Variable ret is being assigned a value that is never read, it is
being re-assigned a couple of statements later on. The assignment
is redundant and can be removed.
Cleans up clang scan build warning:
fs/bcachefs/super-io.c:806:2: warning: Value stored to 'ret' is
never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
fs/bcachefs/super-io.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c b/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
index 110dcb0337ce..c6d590404425 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
@@ -804,7 +804,6 @@ static int __bch2_read_super(const char *path, struct bch_opts *opts,
goto err;
}
- ret = 0;
sb->have_layout = true;
ret = bch2_sb_validate(sb, &err, READ);
--
2.39.2
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:52:03AM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Variable ret is being assigned a value that is never read, it is
> being re-assigned a couple of statements later on. The assignment
> is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Cleans up clang scan build warning:
> fs/bcachefs/super-io.c:806:2: warning: Value stored to 'ret' is
> never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <[email protected]>
> fs/bcachefs/super-io.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c b/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
> index 110dcb0337ce..c6d590404425 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
> @@ -804,7 +804,6 @@ static int __bch2_read_super(const char *path, struct bch_opts *opts,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - ret = 0;
> sb->have_layout = true;
>
> ret = bch2_sb_validate(sb, &err, READ);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:52:03AM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Variable ret is being assigned a value that is never read, it is
> being re-assigned a couple of statements later on. The assignment
> is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Cleans up clang scan build warning:
> fs/bcachefs/super-io.c:806:2: warning: Value stored to 'ret' is
> never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
I'll take this, but - entirely too much of the traffic on this list is
getting taken up by static analyzer bullshit, we need to cut down on
this
On 22/02/2024 00:04, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:52:03AM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> Variable ret is being assigned a value that is never read, it is
>> being re-assigned a couple of statements later on. The assignment
>> is redundant and can be removed.
>>
>> Cleans up clang scan build warning:
>> fs/bcachefs/super-io.c:806:2: warning: Value stored to 'ret' is
>> never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>
> I'll take this, but - entirely too much of the traffic on this list is
> getting taken up by static analyzer bullshit, we need to cut down on
> this
I'll back off then.
Colin
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:08:28AM +0000, Colin King (gmail) wrote:
> On 22/02/2024 00:04, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:52:03AM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > Variable ret is being assigned a value that is never read, it is
> > > being re-assigned a couple of statements later on. The assignment
> > > is redundant and can be removed.
> > >
> > > Cleans up clang scan build warning:
> > > fs/bcachefs/super-io.c:806:2: warning: Value stored to 'ret' is
> > > never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> >
> > I'll take this, but - entirely too much of the traffic on this list is
> > getting taken up by static analyzer bullshit, we need to cut down on
> > this
>
> I'll back off then.
Maybe just wrap up fixes for all the warnings every now and then? It is
worth keeping up on static analyzer warnings, it's just the mailing list
noise I want to cut down on, as well as making better use of my own
time.
I'd be happy to take a patch like that now and then, or - maybe we could
get a dashboard going, like I was just running by Dan in the other
thread? If we could get a dirt simple stupid dashboard that had both the
clangc analyzer warnings, and the smatch warnings - I think that would
make a lot of people happy.
To be honest, the point of explaining how to run Smatch was really to
let you know that you're now on your own.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:24:58AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> To be honest, the point of explaining how to run Smatch was really to
> let you know that you're now on your own.
Ok that's fine - in that case, I just need to ask you to stop bugging me
to get me to explain smatch bugs to you.