The newly added a5xx support fails to build when debugfs is diabled:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:4: error: 'struct msm_gpu_funcs' has no member named 'show'
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:11: error: 'a5xx_show' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'a5xx_irq'?
This adds a missing #ifdef.
Fixes: b5f103ab98c7 ("drm/msm: gpu: Add A5XX target support")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
Originally sent on Nov 30 for v4.10, but I now see this is still required
on v4.11-rc2
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
index 4414cf73735d..f0c8bd74ca91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
@@ -860,7 +860,9 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
.idle = a5xx_idle,
.irq = a5xx_irq,
.destroy = a5xx_destroy,
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
.show = a5xx_show,
+#endif
},
.get_timestamp = a5xx_get_timestamp,
};
--
2.9.0
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> The newly added a5xx support fails to build when debugfs is diabled:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:4: error: 'struct msm_gpu_funcs' has no member named 'show'
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:11: error: 'a5xx_show' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'a5xx_irq'?
>
> This adds a missing #ifdef.
>
> Fixes: b5f103ab98c7 ("drm/msm: gpu: Add A5XX target support")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
I thought I had picked this one up already, but I guess my brain was
playing tricks on me.. I've pushed this to msm-next for now and will
cherry-pick this over to a -fixes branch when I send fixes for 4.11..
BR,
-R
> ---
> Originally sent on Nov 30 for v4.10, but I now see this is still required
> on v4.11-rc2
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
> index 4414cf73735d..f0c8bd74ca91 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
> @@ -860,7 +860,9 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
> .idle = a5xx_idle,
> .irq = a5xx_irq,
> .destroy = a5xx_destroy,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> .show = a5xx_show,
> +#endif
> },
> .get_timestamp = a5xx_get_timestamp,
> };
> --
> 2.9.0
>
On 13 March 2017 at 17:00, Rob Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The newly added a5xx support fails to build when debugfs is diabled:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:4: error: 'struct msm_gpu_funcs' has no member named 'show'
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:11: error: 'a5xx_show' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'a5xx_irq'?
>>
>> This adds a missing #ifdef.
>>
>> Fixes: b5f103ab98c7 ("drm/msm: gpu: Add A5XX target support")
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> I thought I had picked this one up already, but I guess my brain was
> playing tricks on me.. I've pushed this to msm-next for now and will
> cherry-pick this over to a -fixes branch when I send fixes for 4.11..
>
Sean sent a similar patch last week. I think he picked it (alongside
others) in drm-misc-fixes.
Haven't checked though ;-)
-Emil
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:09:17PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 13 March 2017 at 17:00, Rob Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The newly added a5xx support fails to build when debugfs is diabled:
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:4: error: 'struct msm_gpu_funcs' has no member named 'show'
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:11: error: 'a5xx_show' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'a5xx_irq'?
> >>
> >> This adds a missing #ifdef.
> >>
> >> Fixes: b5f103ab98c7 ("drm/msm: gpu: Add A5XX target support")
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> >
> > I thought I had picked this one up already, but I guess my brain was
> > playing tricks on me.. I've pushed this to msm-next for now and will
> > cherry-pick this over to a -fixes branch when I send fixes for 4.11..
> >
> Sean sent a similar patch last week. I think he picked it (alongside
> others) in drm-misc-fixes.
> Haven't checked though ;-)
Indeed [1]. I pushed it to drm-misc-fixes, but I don't see it there any longer.
At any rate, I'm glad we got the fix merged somewhere.
Sean
[1]- https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-March/134876.html
>
> -Emil
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:48:48PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:09:17PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On 13 March 2017 at 17:00, Rob Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> The newly added a5xx support fails to build when debugfs is diabled:
> > >>
> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:4: error: 'struct msm_gpu_funcs' has no member named 'show'
> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c:849:11: error: 'a5xx_show' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'a5xx_irq'?
> > >>
> > >> This adds a missing #ifdef.
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: b5f103ab98c7 ("drm/msm: gpu: Add A5XX target support")
> > >> Cc: [email protected]
> > >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > I thought I had picked this one up already, but I guess my brain was
> > > playing tricks on me.. I've pushed this to msm-next for now and will
> > > cherry-pick this over to a -fixes branch when I send fixes for 4.11..
> > >
> > Sean sent a similar patch last week. I think he picked it (alongside
> > others) in drm-misc-fixes.
> > Haven't checked though ;-)
>
> Indeed [1]. I pushed it to drm-misc-fixes, but I don't see it there any longer.
>
> At any rate, I'm glad we got the fix merged somewhere.
Bad me has force-rebased -fixes once because I screwed up something. Sorry
about that :(
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch