Forwarding to the linux-nfs.org lists.
On Apr. 27, 2010, 21:10 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:44:51PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On Apr. 27, 2010, 19:34 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The main lists we've been using are:
> >
> > [email protected]
> > [email protected]
> > [email protected]
> >
> > This seems to be confusing. We've talked before about transitioning
> > away from one (probably [email protected]). Maybe now's the time to
> > start.
>
> I'm all for it.
> Maybe it's time to fold the pnfs list into linux-nfs too.
So, looking back at what we did for the sourceforge list:
- We added something to the footer saying the list is
deprecated. (But if we wanted to be more obnoxious, we could
add it to the top of each message.)
- We subscribed the new list ([email protected]) to the
old list, I guess so newbie bug reports sent to the old list
wouldn't get lost.
Anyone want to object to starting that process for [email protected]?
What about [email protected]?
--b.
> On Apr. 27, 2010, 21:10 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, looking back at what we did for the sourceforge list:
>
> - We added something to the footer saying the list is
> deprecated. (But if we wanted to be more obnoxious, we could
> add it to the top of each message.)
>
> - We subscribed the new list ([email protected]) to the
> old list, I guess so newbie bug reports sent to the old list
> wouldn't get lost.
>
> Anyone want to object to starting that process for [email protected]?
> What about [email protected]?
ACK to both...
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:33 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Apr. 27, 2010, 21:10 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So, looking back at what we did for the sourceforge list:
> >
> > - We added something to the footer saying the list is
> > deprecated. (But if we wanted to be more obnoxious, we could
> > add it to the top of each message.)
> >
> > - We subscribed the new list ([email protected]) to the
> > old list, I guess so newbie bug reports sent to the old list
> > wouldn't get lost.
> >
> > Anyone want to object to starting that process for [email protected]?
> > What about [email protected]?
>
> ACK to both...
>
>
Oh... The other thing to do is to turn off moderation. I'm sure that
Bruce and I have better things to do than to act as spam filters on
legacy mailing lists...
OK. Let's declare both lists deprecated as of now.
That means that if you're subscribed to either:
[email protected], or
[email protected],
and you want to continue receiving list traffic, you should unsubscribe
from those two, and subscribe instead (if you haven't already) to:
[email protected]
You can do this by sending the linux "subscribe linux-nfs" in the body
of a message to [email protected].
I'll work on making the other changes we discussed to both lists.
--b.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: THIS LIST IS DECPRECATED. Please use [email protected] instead.
NFSv4 mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:02:58AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> OK. Let's declare both lists deprecated as of now.
>
> That means that if you're subscribed to either:
>
> [email protected], or
> [email protected],
>
> and you want to continue receiving list traffic, you should unsubscribe
> from those two, and subscribe instead (if you haven't already) to:
>
> [email protected]
>
> You can do this by sending the linux "subscribe linux-nfs" in the body
> of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TaiAVqoAR/[email protected]
>
> I'll work on making the other changes we discussed to both lists.
And that should be done. (Apologies for multiple copies of this mail.)
--b.