2023-05-04 13:42:53

by Piyush Malgujar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

Added changes to support EINJV2 from ACPI V6.5. This adds
new additional actions: EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE and
EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE which supports PCIe,processor and
memory error for single component syndrome.

Signed-off-by: Piyush Malgujar <[email protected]>
---
v1 ---> v2
- Added EINJ V2 details in einj.rst document.
---
.../firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst | 54 ++++++
drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++--
include/acpi/actbl1.h | 4 +-
3 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst
index d6b61d22f52584a66f5f8aed51b0a9ce0d93c2d6..6e8640e7c0462c05b363d8f145e4c068ad98a7e7 100644
--- a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst
+++ b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst
@@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ The following files belong to it:
0x00000800 Platform Uncorrectable fatal
================ ===================================

+ If EINJV2 is supported, this file shows which error types are for it:
+
+ ================ ===================================
+ Error Type Value Error Description
+ ================ ===================================
+ 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
+ 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
+ 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
+
The format of the file contents are as above, except present are only
the available error types.

@@ -88,6 +97,17 @@ The following files belong to it:
If set to zero, legacy behavior is mimicked where the type of
injection specifies just one bit set, and param1 is multiplexed.

+ EINJ V2 flags are detailed as per ACPI6.5 spec:
+
+ Bit 0
+ Address Valid
+ Bit 1
+ Address Range Valid
+ Bit 2
+ Severity Valid
+ Bit 3
+ Component Syndrome Count and Array is valid
+
- param1

This file is used to set the first error parameter value. Its effect
@@ -95,19 +115,37 @@ The following files belong to it:
error type is memory related type, the param1 should be a valid
physical memory address. [Unless "flag" is set - see above]

+ EINJ V2:
+ This depends upon error type specified in error_type. It can be
+ memory address/ACPI ID/PCIE SBDF.
+
- param2

Same use as param1 above. For example, if error type is of memory
related type, then param2 should be a physical memory address mask.
Linux requires page or narrower granularity, say, 0xfffffffffffff000.

+ EINJ V2:
+ Based on error type, this can be memory address range or processor/
+ PCIe syndrome which is vendor specific.
+
- param3

Used when the 0x1 bit is set in "flags" to specify the APIC id

+ EINJ V2:
+ For memory error, this will be device ID, for other type of errors,
+ this represents severity.
+
- param4
Used when the 0x4 bit is set in "flags" to specify target PCIe device

+ EINJ V2:
+ For memory error, this represents memory syndrome.
+
+- param5
+ For memory error, this represent the severity.
+
- notrigger

The error injection mechanism is a two-step process. First inject the
@@ -181,6 +219,22 @@ You should see something like this in dmesg::
[22715.834759] EDAC sbridge MC3: PROCESSOR 0:306e7 TIME 1422553404 SOCKET 0 APIC 0
[22716.616173] EDAC MC3: 1 CE memory read error on CPU_SrcID#0_Channel#0_DIMM#0 (channel:0 slot:0 page:0x12345 offset:0x0 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 - area:DRAM err_code:0001:0090 socket:0 channel_mask:1 rank:0)

+ACPI 6.5 spec introduces two new error injection action: EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE and EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE.
+EINJv2 breaks out the Error Type from the severity.
+
+An error injection example::
+
+ # cd /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj
+ # cat available_error_type # See which errors can be injected
+ 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
+ 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
+ 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
+ # echo 0x2 > error_type
+ # echo 0x5 > flags
+ # echo 0x12345000 > param1
+ # echo 0x2 > param5
+ # echo 1 > error_inject
+
Special notes for injection into SGX enclaves:

There may be a separate BIOS setup option to enable SGX injection.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
index 013eb621dc92a7c11b00577a890c06fc64453a2c..97f87ad125af79b2a6f73c0741f728cb9c799992 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#define SLEEP_UNIT_MAX 5000 /* 5ms */
/* Firmware should respond within 1 seconds */
#define FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT (1 * USEC_PER_SEC)
+#define ACPI65_EINJV2_SUPP BIT(30)
#define ACPI5_VENDOR_BIT BIT(31)
#define MEM_ERROR_MASK (ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_CORRECTABLE | \
ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_UNCORRECTABLE | \
@@ -42,6 +43,51 @@
*/
static int acpi5;

+/*
+ * ACPI version 6.5 provides a EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE action.
+ */
+static int einjv2_supp;
+
+struct syndrome_array {
+ union {
+ u32 acpi_id;
+ u32 device_id;
+ u32 pcie_sbdf;
+ u8 fru_id[16];
+ } comp_id;
+ union {
+ u32 proc_synd;
+ u32 mem_synd;
+ u32 pcie_synd;
+ u8 vendor_synd[16];
+ } comp_synd;
+};
+
+struct einjv2_set_error_type {
+ u32 type;
+ u8 type_code;
+ u8 flags[3];
+ u32 length;
+ u32 severity;
+ u64 memory_address;
+ u64 memory_address_range;
+ u32 syndrome_count;
+ struct syndrome_array array[0];
+};
+
+enum {
+ EINJV2_PROCESSOR_ERROR = 0x1,
+ EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR = 0x2,
+ EINJV2_PCIE_ERROR = 0x4,
+};
+
+enum {
+ EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_VALID = 0x1,
+ EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_RANGE_VALID = 0x2,
+ EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID = 0x4,
+ EINJV2_FLAG_COMP_VALID = 0x8,
+};
+
struct set_error_type_with_address {
u32 type;
u32 vendor_extension;
@@ -155,6 +201,13 @@ static int __einj_get_available_error_type(u32 *type)
return rc;
*type = apei_exec_ctx_get_output(&ctx);

+ if (*type & ACPI65_EINJV2_SUPP) {
+ rc = apei_exec_run(&ctx, ACPI_EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ *type = apei_exec_ctx_get_output(&ctx);
+ }
+
return 0;
}

@@ -205,7 +258,7 @@ static void check_vendor_extension(u64 paddr,
static void *einj_get_parameter_address(void)
{
int i;
- u64 pa_v4 = 0, pa_v5 = 0;
+ u64 pa_v4 = 0, pa_v5 = 0, pa_v65 = 0;
struct acpi_whea_header *entry;

entry = EINJ_TAB_ENTRY(einj_tab);
@@ -220,8 +273,22 @@ static void *einj_get_parameter_address(void)
entry->register_region.space_id ==
ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
pa_v5 = get_unaligned(&entry->register_region.address);
+ if (entry->action == ACPI_EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE &&
+ entry->instruction == ACPI_EINJ_WRITE_REGISTER &&
+ entry->register_region.space_id ==
+ ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
+ pa_v65 = get_unaligned(&entry->register_region.address);
entry++;
}
+ if (pa_v65) {
+ struct einjv2_set_error_type *v65param;
+
+ v65param = acpi_os_map_iomem(pa_v65, sizeof(*v65param));
+ if (v65param) {
+ einjv2_supp = 1;
+ return v65param;
+ }
+ }
if (pa_v5) {
struct set_error_type_with_address *v5param;

@@ -356,7 +423,9 @@ static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trigger_paddr, u32 type,
* This will cause resource conflict with regular memory. So
* remove it from trigger table resources.
*/
- if ((param_extension || acpi5) && (type & MEM_ERROR_MASK) && param2) {
+ if ((param_extension || acpi5 || einjv2_supp) &&
+ ((einjv2_supp && (type & EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR)) ||
+ type & MEM_ERROR_MASK) && param2) {
struct apei_resources addr_resources;

apei_resources_init(&addr_resources);
@@ -402,7 +471,7 @@ static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trigger_paddr, u32 type,
}

static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
- u64 param3, u64 param4)
+ u64 param3, u64 param4, u64 param5)
{
struct apei_exec_context ctx;
u64 val, trigger_paddr, timeout = FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT;
@@ -414,7 +483,46 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
if (rc)
return rc;
apei_exec_ctx_set_input(&ctx, type);
- if (acpi5) {
+
+ if (einjv2_supp) {
+ struct einjv2_set_error_type *v65param = einj_param;
+
+ v65param->type = type;
+ v65param->flags[0] = flags;
+
+ if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_COMP_VALID) {
+ switch (v65param->type) {
+ case EINJV2_PROCESSOR_ERROR:
+ v65param->array[0].comp_id.acpi_id = param1;
+ v65param->array[0].comp_synd.proc_synd = param2;
+ break;
+ case EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR:
+ v65param->array[0].comp_id.device_id = param3;
+ v65param->array[0].comp_synd.mem_synd = param4;
+ break;
+ case EINJV2_PCIE_ERROR:
+ v65param->array[0].comp_id.pcie_sbdf = param1;
+ v65param->array[0].comp_synd.pcie_synd = param2;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (v65param->type & EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR) {
+ if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_VALID)
+ v65param->memory_address = param1;
+ if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_RANGE_VALID)
+ v65param->memory_address_range = param2;
+ if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID)
+ v65param->severity = param5;
+ } else {
+ if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID)
+ v65param->severity = param3;
+ }
+ v65param->syndrome_count = 1;
+ v65param->length = sizeof(struct einjv2_set_error_type) +
+ ((v65param->syndrome_count) *
+ sizeof(struct syndrome_array));
+ } else if (acpi5) {
struct set_error_type_with_address *v5param = einj_param;

v5param->type = type;
@@ -514,15 +622,23 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,

/* Inject the specified hardware error */
static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
- u64 param3, u64 param4)
+ u64 param3, u64 param4, u64 param5)
{
int rc;
u64 base_addr, size;

/* If user manually set "flags", make sure it is legal */
- if (flags && (flags &
- ~(SETWA_FLAGS_APICID|SETWA_FLAGS_MEM|SETWA_FLAGS_PCIE_SBDF)))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (einjv2_supp) {
+ if (flags && (flags &
+ ~(EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_VALID | EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_RANGE_VALID |
+ EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID | EINJV2_FLAG_COMP_VALID)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ if (flags && (flags &
+ ~(SETWA_FLAGS_APICID | SETWA_FLAGS_MEM |
+ SETWA_FLAGS_PCIE_SBDF)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }

/*
* We need extra sanity checks for memory errors.
@@ -530,11 +646,13 @@ static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
*/

/* ensure param1/param2 existed */
- if (!(param_extension || acpi5))
+ if (!(param_extension || acpi5 || einjv2_supp))
goto inject;

/* ensure injection is memory related */
- if (type & ACPI5_VENDOR_BIT) {
+ if (einjv2_supp && !(type & EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR)) {
+ goto inject;
+ } else if (type & ACPI5_VENDOR_BIT) {
if (vendor_flags != SETWA_FLAGS_MEM)
goto inject;
} else if (!(type & MEM_ERROR_MASK) && !(flags & SETWA_FLAGS_MEM))
@@ -564,7 +682,7 @@ static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,

inject:
mutex_lock(&einj_mutex);
- rc = __einj_error_inject(type, flags, param1, param2, param3, param4);
+ rc = __einj_error_inject(type, flags, param1, param2, param3, param4, param5);
mutex_unlock(&einj_mutex);

return rc;
@@ -576,7 +694,15 @@ static u64 error_param1;
static u64 error_param2;
static u64 error_param3;
static u64 error_param4;
+static u64 error_param5;
static struct dentry *einj_debug_dir;
+
+static const char * const einjv2_error_type_string[] = {
+ "0x00000001\tEINJV2 Processor Error\n",
+ "0x00000002\tEINJV2 Memory Error\n",
+ "0x00000004\tEINJV2 PCI Express Error\n",
+};
+
static const char * const einj_error_type_string[] = {
"0x00000001\tProcessor Correctable\n",
"0x00000002\tProcessor Uncorrectable non-fatal\n",
@@ -600,15 +726,22 @@ static const char * const einj_error_type_string[] = {

static int available_error_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
- int rc;
+ int rc, pos;
u32 available_error_type = 0;

rc = einj_get_available_error_type(&available_error_type);
if (rc)
return rc;
- for (int pos = 0; pos < ARRAY_SIZE(einj_error_type_string); pos++)
- if (available_error_type & BIT(pos))
- seq_puts(m, einj_error_type_string[pos]);
+
+ if (einjv2_supp) {
+ for (pos = 0; pos < ARRAY_SIZE(einjv2_error_type_string); pos++)
+ if (available_error_type & BIT(pos))
+ seq_puts(m, einjv2_error_type_string[pos]);
+ } else {
+ for (pos = 0; pos < ARRAY_SIZE(einj_error_type_string); pos++)
+ if (available_error_type & BIT(pos))
+ seq_puts(m, einj_error_type_string[pos]);
+ }

return 0;
}
@@ -662,8 +795,9 @@ static int error_inject_set(void *data, u64 val)
if (!error_type)
return -EINVAL;

- return einj_error_inject(error_type, error_flags, error_param1, error_param2,
- error_param3, error_param4);
+ return einj_error_inject(error_type, error_flags, error_param1,
+ error_param2, error_param3, error_param4,
+ error_param5);
}

DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(error_inject_fops, NULL, error_inject_set, "%llu\n");
@@ -743,7 +877,7 @@ static int __init einj_init(void)
}

einj_param = einj_get_parameter_address();
- if ((param_extension || acpi5) && einj_param) {
+ if ((param_extension || acpi5 || einjv2_supp) && einj_param) {
debugfs_create_x32("flags", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
&error_flags);
debugfs_create_x64("param1", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
@@ -754,6 +888,8 @@ static int __init einj_init(void)
&error_param3);
debugfs_create_x64("param4", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
&error_param4);
+ debugfs_create_x64("param5", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
+ &error_param5);
debugfs_create_x32("notrigger", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR,
einj_debug_dir, &notrigger);
}
diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl1.h b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
index 58b0490a2ad12e26cab30209e461429a1f5dec30..de89c18f3443489683c9aafaf6a894e60d98374b 100644
--- a/include/acpi/actbl1.h
+++ b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
@@ -1026,7 +1026,9 @@ enum acpi_einj_actions {
ACPI_EINJ_GET_COMMAND_STATUS = 7,
ACPI_EINJ_SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS = 8,
ACPI_EINJ_GET_EXECUTE_TIMINGS = 9,
- ACPI_EINJ_ACTION_RESERVED = 10, /* 10 and greater are reserved */
+ ACPI_EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE = 0x10,
+ ACPI_EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE = 0x11,
+ ACPI_EINJ_ACTION_RESERVED = 0x12, /* 12 and greater are reserved */
ACPI_EINJ_TRIGGER_ERROR = 0xFF /* Except for this value */
};

--
2.17.1


2023-05-04 16:48:36

by Tony Luck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

+An error injection example::
+
+ # cd /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj
+ # cat available_error_type # See which errors can be injected
+ 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
+ 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
+ 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
+ # echo 0x2 > error_type
+ # echo 0x5 > flags
+ # echo 0x12345000 > param1
+ # echo 0x2 > param5
+ # echo 1 > error_inject

Is the expectation that platforms that implement EINJV2 will not include legacy
EINJ support?

The Linux error injection API is all in "debugfs", so maybe there shouldn't be
an expectation that old injection tests will work on new systems. But this is
going to catch some by surprise.

Maybe it would be better to change the top-level directory to:

/sys/kernel/debug/apei/einjv2

so that old scripts and programs will fail immediately, rather than do
weird things writing legacy einj values to the various files.

And ... since there is no expectation of backward compatibility ... perhaps
take this opportunity to re-think the entire API? Perhaps something like this,
With just a single file for all parameters?

# echo "memory notrigger 0x12345 0x2" > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einjv2/inject

or separate files for each injection target:

# echo "0x12345 0x2 notrigger" > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einjv2/inject_memory

-Tony

2023-05-04 21:08:01

by Tony Luck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

> +An error injection example::
> +
> + # cd /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj
> + # cat available_error_type # See which errors can be injected
> + 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
> + 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
> + 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
> + # echo 0x2 > error_type
> + # echo 0x5 > flags
> + # echo 0x12345000 > param1
> + # echo 0x2 > param5
> + # echo 1 > error_inject
>
> Is the expectation that platforms that implement EINJV2 will not include legacy
> EINJ support?

I spoke to some BIOS folks here. They said that the ACPI 6.5 change is an
extension to the action table with new opcodes for GET/SET when EINJV2
is supported. The legacy actions are not deprecated. So platform firmware could
support both old and new injection formats.

So I'm going to double down on this:

> Maybe it would be better to change the top-level directory to:
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einjv2

and say this isn't a "maybe". The EINJV2 interface files should go
in a new directory. The old files should continue to work (assuming
firmware still enumerates the old available types).

Simplifying the interface for EINJV2 in the new directory is an option.
I think we should take it ... the "paramN" files that mean different
things for different injection types were an evolution rather than a design.

-Tony




2023-05-09 15:11:46

by Piyush Malgujar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

Hi Tony,

Thanks for the review comments.

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 09:00:51PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > +An error injection example::
> > +
> > + # cd /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj
> > + # cat available_error_type # See which errors can be injected
> > + 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
> > + 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
> > + 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
> > + # echo 0x2 > error_type
> > + # echo 0x5 > flags
> > + # echo 0x12345000 > param1
> > + # echo 0x2 > param5
> > + # echo 1 > error_inject
> >
> > Is the expectation that platforms that implement EINJV2 will not include legacy
> > EINJ support?
>
> I spoke to some BIOS folks here. They said that the ACPI 6.5 change is an
> extension to the action table with new opcodes for GET/SET when EINJV2
> is supported. The legacy actions are not deprecated. So platform firmware could
> support both old and new injection formats.
>
> So I'm going to double down on this:
>
> > Maybe it would be better to change the top-level directory to:
> >
> > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einjv2
>
> and say this isn't a "maybe". The EINJV2 interface files should go
> in a new directory. The old files should continue to work (assuming
> firmware still enumerates the old available types).
>
> Simplifying the interface for EINJV2 in the new directory is an option.
> I think we should take it ... the "paramN" files that mean different
> things for different injection types were an evolution rather than a design.
>
> -Tony
>
>
>
>
If a platform supports einj v2, then the einj directory wont be needed, as per spec,
if a non-zero Error Type value is set by EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE, then any Error Type
value set by (einj case) SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS and/or SET_ERROR_TYPE will be
ignored. So based on einjv2 is supported or not, we can have either einjv2 or einj
directory with the related params files in it respectively.
Kindly let us know your thoughts.

Thanks,
Piyush

2023-05-09 18:55:22

by Tony Luck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

> If a platform supports einj v2, then the einj directory wont be needed, as per spec,
> if a non-zero Error Type value is set by EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE, then any Error Type
> value set by (einj case) SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS and/or SET_ERROR_TYPE will be
> ignored. So based on einjv2 is supported or not, we can have either einjv2 or einj
> directory with the related params files in it respectively.
> Kindly let us know your thoughts.

Piyush,

There are a lot of validation tests built on top of the EINJ v1 Linux interface and interest
in keeping them working rather than forcing a giant "change everything" when the first
EINJ V2 system arrives.

BIOS team here thinks that the EINJ V2 spec change is (or can be) incremental.
Platform firmware can choose to continue supporting EINJ V1 while also providing
EINJ V2 actions.

So Linux should be prepared to handle:

1) Legacy systems with just the V1 interface.

2) Incremental systems that have both V1 and V2 interfaces.

3) Future looking systems that only have the V2 interface.

-Tony

2023-05-30 16:19:35

by Wilczynski, Michal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added



On 5/9/2023 8:35 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> If a platform supports einj v2, then the einj directory wont be needed, as per spec,
>> if a non-zero Error Type value is set by EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE, then any Error Type
>> value set by (einj case) SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS and/or SET_ERROR_TYPE will be
>> ignored. So based on einjv2 is supported or not, we can have either einjv2 or einj
>> directory with the related params files in it respectively.
>> Kindly let us know your thoughts.
> Piyush,
>
> There are a lot of validation tests built on top of the EINJ v1 Linux interface and interest
> in keeping them working rather than forcing a giant "change everything" when the first
> EINJ V2 system arrives.
>
> BIOS team here thinks that the EINJ V2 spec change is (or can be) incremental.
> Platform firmware can choose to continue supporting EINJ V1 while also providing
> EINJ V2 actions.
>
> So Linux should be prepared to handle:
>
> 1) Legacy systems with just the V1 interface.
>
> 2) Incremental systems that have both V1 and V2 interfaces.
>
> 3) Future looking systems that only have the V2 interface.
>
> -Tony

Hi all,

It seems to me like backwards compatibility has been a big priority historically for Linux.
I guess with debugfs we get more leeway to change things, however this interface seems
to be present for a very long time and seems to be entrenched enough to keep backwards
compatibility.


Piyush,
Did you make any progress on the solution ? I can offer some help if you don't have BW to work
on this.


Good video on the topic :)
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn-SGblUhi4&ab_channel=FelipeContreras

>
>


2023-05-31 15:07:32

by Piyush Malgujar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 06:05:48PM +0200, Wilczynski, Michal wrote:
>
>
> On 5/9/2023 8:35 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> If a platform supports einj v2, then the einj directory wont be needed, as per spec,
> >> if a non-zero Error Type value is set by EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE, then any Error Type
> >> value set by (einj case) SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS and/or SET_ERROR_TYPE will be
> >> ignored. So based on einjv2 is supported or not, we can have either einjv2 or einj
> >> directory with the related params files in it respectively.
> >> Kindly let us know your thoughts.
> > Piyush,
> >
> > There are a lot of validation tests built on top of the EINJ v1 Linux interface and interest
> > in keeping them working rather than forcing a giant "change everything" when the first
> > EINJ V2 system arrives.
> >
> > BIOS team here thinks that the EINJ V2 spec change is (or can be) incremental.
> > Platform firmware can choose to continue supporting EINJ V1 while also providing
> > EINJ V2 actions.
> >
> > So Linux should be prepared to handle:
> >
> > 1) Legacy systems with just the V1 interface.
> >
> > 2) Incremental systems that have both V1 and V2 interfaces.
> >
> > 3) Future looking systems that only have the V2 interface.
> >
> > -Tony
>
> Hi all,
>
> It seems to me like backwards compatibility has been a big priority historically for Linux.
> I guess with debugfs we get more leeway to change things, however this interface seems
> to be present for a very long time and seems to be entrenched enough to keep backwards
> compatibility.
>
>
> Piyush,
> Did you make any progress on the solution ? I can offer some help if you don't have BW to work
> on this.
>
>
> Good video on the topic :)
> Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn-SGblUhi4&ab_channel=FelipeContreras
>
> >
> >
>

Hi Michal, Tony,

Thanks for your reply.

I get that we have to support v1 and v2 for backward compatibility, but for the point no.2
made by Tony -
"2) Incremental systems that have both V1 and V2 interfaces.",
just wanted to understand if we expect any use case where if EINJ V2 is supported, both v1
and v2 interfaces shall be required at the same time for error injection, as from the spec,
if V2 is supported, EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE takes precedence.

This seems to be similar with V1 action types - whether to go with SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS or
SET_ERROR_TYPE, is based on the action entry in the EINJ table where "SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS"
gets precedence.

Please share your inputs.

Thanks,
Piyush

2023-05-31 16:35:54

by Tony Luck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

> I get that we have to support v1 and v2 for backward compatibility, but for the point no.2
> made by Tony -
> "2) Incremental systems that have both V1 and V2 interfaces.",
> just wanted to understand if we expect any use case where if EINJ V2 is supported, both v1
> and v2 interfaces shall be required at the same time for error injection, as from the spec,
> if V2 is supported, EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE takes precedence.
>
> This seems to be similar with V1 action types - whether to go with SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS or
> SET_ERROR_TYPE, is based on the action entry in the EINJ table where "SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS"
> gets precedence.

I don't think it will be required to support users mix and matching v1 and v2 in the middle of an injection.
So will need some locking between the einj/error_inject and the einjv2/error_inject action phase.

I'd still like to see the einjv2 injection supply all parameters in a single write to a debugfs file
and have the driver parse the values.

E.g.

# echo "corrected memory 0x1234567890 notrigger" > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einjv2/error_inject

That would make injection a user-level atomic operation, and avoid all the confusion that results
from updating the param1, param2, ... files individually.

-Tony

2023-06-01 15:00:24

by Xiaofei Tan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added


在 2023/5/4 21:32, Piyush Malgujar 写道:
> Added changes to support EINJV2 from ACPI V6.5. This adds
> new additional actions: EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE and
> EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE which supports PCIe,processor and
> memory error for single component syndrome.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piyush Malgujar <[email protected]>
> ---
> v1 ---> v2
> - Added EINJ V2 details in einj.rst document.
> ---
> .../firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst | 54 ++++++
> drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++--
> include/acpi/actbl1.h | 4 +-
> 3 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst
> index d6b61d22f52584a66f5f8aed51b0a9ce0d93c2d6..6e8640e7c0462c05b363d8f145e4c068ad98a7e7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/apei/einj.rst
> @@ -57,6 +57,15 @@ The following files belong to it:
> 0x00000800 Platform Uncorrectable fatal
> ================ ===================================
>
> + If EINJV2 is supported, this file shows which error types are for it:
> +
> + ================ ===================================
> + Error Type Value Error Description
> + ================ ===================================
> + 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
> + 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
> + 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
> +

Hi Piyush,

ACPI6.5 also defined error type for Vendor Specific Error (0x80000000) . The struct syndrome_array
has defined it but the function is not implemented in this patch. Would you want support it in follow-up patch?
or better to put it in this patch to make it a complete implementation?

by Xiaofei

> The format of the file contents are as above, except present are only
> the available error types.
>
> @@ -88,6 +97,17 @@ The following files belong to it:
> If set to zero, legacy behavior is mimicked where the type of
> injection specifies just one bit set, and param1 is multiplexed.
>
> + EINJ V2 flags are detailed as per ACPI6.5 spec:
> +
> + Bit 0
> + Address Valid
> + Bit 1
> + Address Range Valid
> + Bit 2
> + Severity Valid
> + Bit 3
> + Component Syndrome Count and Array is valid
> +
> - param1
>
> This file is used to set the first error parameter value. Its effect
> @@ -95,19 +115,37 @@ The following files belong to it:
> error type is memory related type, the param1 should be a valid
> physical memory address. [Unless "flag" is set - see above]
>
> + EINJ V2:
> + This depends upon error type specified in error_type. It can be
> + memory address/ACPI ID/PCIE SBDF.
> +
> - param2
>
> Same use as param1 above. For example, if error type is of memory
> related type, then param2 should be a physical memory address mask.
> Linux requires page or narrower granularity, say, 0xfffffffffffff000.
>
> + EINJ V2:
> + Based on error type, this can be memory address range or processor/
> + PCIe syndrome which is vendor specific.
> +
> - param3
>
> Used when the 0x1 bit is set in "flags" to specify the APIC id
>
> + EINJ V2:
> + For memory error, this will be device ID, for other type of errors,
> + this represents severity.
> +
> - param4
> Used when the 0x4 bit is set in "flags" to specify target PCIe device
>
> + EINJ V2:
> + For memory error, this represents memory syndrome.
> +
> +- param5
> + For memory error, this represent the severity.
> +
> - notrigger
>
> The error injection mechanism is a two-step process. First inject the
> @@ -181,6 +219,22 @@ You should see something like this in dmesg::
> [22715.834759] EDAC sbridge MC3: PROCESSOR 0:306e7 TIME 1422553404 SOCKET 0 APIC 0
> [22716.616173] EDAC MC3: 1 CE memory read error on CPU_SrcID#0_Channel#0_DIMM#0 (channel:0 slot:0 page:0x12345 offset:0x0 grain:32 syndrome:0x0 - area:DRAM err_code:0001:0090 socket:0 channel_mask:1 rank:0)
>
> +ACPI 6.5 spec introduces two new error injection action: EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE and EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE.
> +EINJv2 breaks out the Error Type from the severity.
> +
> +An error injection example::
> +
> + # cd /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj
> + # cat available_error_type # See which errors can be injected
> + 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
> + 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
> + 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
> + # echo 0x2 > error_type
> + # echo 0x5 > flags
> + # echo 0x12345000 > param1
> + # echo 0x2 > param5
> + # echo 1 > error_inject
> +
> Special notes for injection into SGX enclaves:
>
> There may be a separate BIOS setup option to enable SGX injection.
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> index 013eb621dc92a7c11b00577a890c06fc64453a2c..97f87ad125af79b2a6f73c0741f728cb9c799992 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #define SLEEP_UNIT_MAX 5000 /* 5ms */
> /* Firmware should respond within 1 seconds */
> #define FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT (1 * USEC_PER_SEC)
> +#define ACPI65_EINJV2_SUPP BIT(30)
> #define ACPI5_VENDOR_BIT BIT(31)
> #define MEM_ERROR_MASK (ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_CORRECTABLE | \
> ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_UNCORRECTABLE | \
> @@ -42,6 +43,51 @@
> */
> static int acpi5;
>
> +/*
> + * ACPI version 6.5 provides a EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE action.
> + */
> +static int einjv2_supp;
> +
> +struct syndrome_array {
> + union {
> + u32 acpi_id;
> + u32 device_id;
> + u32 pcie_sbdf;
> + u8 fru_id[16];
> + } comp_id;
> + union {
> + u32 proc_synd;
> + u32 mem_synd;
> + u32 pcie_synd;
> + u8 vendor_synd[16];
> + } comp_synd;
> +};
> +
> +struct einjv2_set_error_type {
> + u32 type;
> + u8 type_code;
> + u8 flags[3];
> + u32 length;
> + u32 severity;
> + u64 memory_address;
> + u64 memory_address_range;
> + u32 syndrome_count;
> + struct syndrome_array array[0];
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + EINJV2_PROCESSOR_ERROR = 0x1,
> + EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR = 0x2,
> + EINJV2_PCIE_ERROR = 0x4,
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_VALID = 0x1,
> + EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_RANGE_VALID = 0x2,
> + EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID = 0x4,
> + EINJV2_FLAG_COMP_VALID = 0x8,
> +};
> +
> struct set_error_type_with_address {
> u32 type;
> u32 vendor_extension;
> @@ -155,6 +201,13 @@ static int __einj_get_available_error_type(u32 *type)
> return rc;
> *type = apei_exec_ctx_get_output(&ctx);
>
> + if (*type & ACPI65_EINJV2_SUPP) {
> + rc = apei_exec_run(&ctx, ACPI_EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> + *type = apei_exec_ctx_get_output(&ctx);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -205,7 +258,7 @@ static void check_vendor_extension(u64 paddr,
> static void *einj_get_parameter_address(void)
> {
> int i;
> - u64 pa_v4 = 0, pa_v5 = 0;
> + u64 pa_v4 = 0, pa_v5 = 0, pa_v65 = 0;
> struct acpi_whea_header *entry;
>
> entry = EINJ_TAB_ENTRY(einj_tab);
> @@ -220,8 +273,22 @@ static void *einj_get_parameter_address(void)
> entry->register_region.space_id ==
> ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
> pa_v5 = get_unaligned(&entry->register_region.address);
> + if (entry->action == ACPI_EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE &&
> + entry->instruction == ACPI_EINJ_WRITE_REGISTER &&
> + entry->register_region.space_id ==
> + ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
> + pa_v65 = get_unaligned(&entry->register_region.address);
> entry++;
> }
> + if (pa_v65) {
> + struct einjv2_set_error_type *v65param;
> +
> + v65param = acpi_os_map_iomem(pa_v65, sizeof(*v65param));
> + if (v65param) {
> + einjv2_supp = 1;
> + return v65param;
> + }
> + }
> if (pa_v5) {
> struct set_error_type_with_address *v5param;
>
> @@ -356,7 +423,9 @@ static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trigger_paddr, u32 type,
> * This will cause resource conflict with regular memory. So
> * remove it from trigger table resources.
> */
> - if ((param_extension || acpi5) && (type & MEM_ERROR_MASK) && param2) {
> + if ((param_extension || acpi5 || einjv2_supp) &&
> + ((einjv2_supp && (type & EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR)) ||
> + type & MEM_ERROR_MASK) && param2) {
> struct apei_resources addr_resources;
>
> apei_resources_init(&addr_resources);
> @@ -402,7 +471,7 @@ static int __einj_error_trigger(u64 trigger_paddr, u32 type,
> }
>
> static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
> - u64 param3, u64 param4)
> + u64 param3, u64 param4, u64 param5)
> {
> struct apei_exec_context ctx;
> u64 val, trigger_paddr, timeout = FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT;
> @@ -414,7 +483,46 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> apei_exec_ctx_set_input(&ctx, type);
> - if (acpi5) {
> +
> + if (einjv2_supp) {
> + struct einjv2_set_error_type *v65param = einj_param;
> +
> + v65param->type = type;
> + v65param->flags[0] = flags;
> +
> + if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_COMP_VALID) {
> + switch (v65param->type) {
> + case EINJV2_PROCESSOR_ERROR:
> + v65param->array[0].comp_id.acpi_id = param1;
> + v65param->array[0].comp_synd.proc_synd = param2;
> + break;
> + case EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR:
> + v65param->array[0].comp_id.device_id = param3;
> + v65param->array[0].comp_synd.mem_synd = param4;
> + break;
> + case EINJV2_PCIE_ERROR:
> + v65param->array[0].comp_id.pcie_sbdf = param1;
> + v65param->array[0].comp_synd.pcie_synd = param2;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (v65param->type & EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR) {
> + if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_VALID)
> + v65param->memory_address = param1;
> + if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_RANGE_VALID)
> + v65param->memory_address_range = param2;
> + if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID)
> + v65param->severity = param5;
> + } else {
> + if (v65param->flags[0] & EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID)
> + v65param->severity = param3;
> + }
> + v65param->syndrome_count = 1;
> + v65param->length = sizeof(struct einjv2_set_error_type) +
> + ((v65param->syndrome_count) *
> + sizeof(struct syndrome_array));
> + } else if (acpi5) {
> struct set_error_type_with_address *v5param = einj_param;
>
> v5param->type = type;
> @@ -514,15 +622,23 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
>
> /* Inject the specified hardware error */
> static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
> - u64 param3, u64 param4)
> + u64 param3, u64 param4, u64 param5)
> {
> int rc;
> u64 base_addr, size;
>
> /* If user manually set "flags", make sure it is legal */
> - if (flags && (flags &
> - ~(SETWA_FLAGS_APICID|SETWA_FLAGS_MEM|SETWA_FLAGS_PCIE_SBDF)))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (einjv2_supp) {
> + if (flags && (flags &
> + ~(EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_VALID | EINJV2_FLAG_ADD_RANGE_VALID |
> + EINJV2_FLAG_SEVERITY_VALID | EINJV2_FLAG_COMP_VALID)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + if (flags && (flags &
> + ~(SETWA_FLAGS_APICID | SETWA_FLAGS_MEM |
> + SETWA_FLAGS_PCIE_SBDF)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> /*
> * We need extra sanity checks for memory errors.
> @@ -530,11 +646,13 @@ static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
> */
>
> /* ensure param1/param2 existed */
> - if (!(param_extension || acpi5))
> + if (!(param_extension || acpi5 || einjv2_supp))
> goto inject;
>
> /* ensure injection is memory related */
> - if (type & ACPI5_VENDOR_BIT) {
> + if (einjv2_supp && !(type & EINJV2_MEMORY_ERROR)) {
> + goto inject;
> + } else if (type & ACPI5_VENDOR_BIT) {
> if (vendor_flags != SETWA_FLAGS_MEM)
> goto inject;
> } else if (!(type & MEM_ERROR_MASK) && !(flags & SETWA_FLAGS_MEM))
> @@ -564,7 +682,7 @@ static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
>
> inject:
> mutex_lock(&einj_mutex);
> - rc = __einj_error_inject(type, flags, param1, param2, param3, param4);
> + rc = __einj_error_inject(type, flags, param1, param2, param3, param4, param5);
> mutex_unlock(&einj_mutex);
>
> return rc;
> @@ -576,7 +694,15 @@ static u64 error_param1;
> static u64 error_param2;
> static u64 error_param3;
> static u64 error_param4;
> +static u64 error_param5;
> static struct dentry *einj_debug_dir;
> +
> +static const char * const einjv2_error_type_string[] = {
> + "0x00000001\tEINJV2 Processor Error\n",
> + "0x00000002\tEINJV2 Memory Error\n",
> + "0x00000004\tEINJV2 PCI Express Error\n",
> +};
> +
> static const char * const einj_error_type_string[] = {
> "0x00000001\tProcessor Correctable\n",
> "0x00000002\tProcessor Uncorrectable non-fatal\n",
> @@ -600,15 +726,22 @@ static const char * const einj_error_type_string[] = {
>
> static int available_error_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> - int rc;
> + int rc, pos;
> u32 available_error_type = 0;
>
> rc = einj_get_available_error_type(&available_error_type);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
> - for (int pos = 0; pos < ARRAY_SIZE(einj_error_type_string); pos++)
> - if (available_error_type & BIT(pos))
> - seq_puts(m, einj_error_type_string[pos]);
> +
> + if (einjv2_supp) {
> + for (pos = 0; pos < ARRAY_SIZE(einjv2_error_type_string); pos++)
> + if (available_error_type & BIT(pos))
> + seq_puts(m, einjv2_error_type_string[pos]);
> + } else {
> + for (pos = 0; pos < ARRAY_SIZE(einj_error_type_string); pos++)
> + if (available_error_type & BIT(pos))
> + seq_puts(m, einj_error_type_string[pos]);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -662,8 +795,9 @@ static int error_inject_set(void *data, u64 val)
> if (!error_type)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return einj_error_inject(error_type, error_flags, error_param1, error_param2,
> - error_param3, error_param4);
> + return einj_error_inject(error_type, error_flags, error_param1,
> + error_param2, error_param3, error_param4,
> + error_param5);
> }
>
> DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(error_inject_fops, NULL, error_inject_set, "%llu\n");
> @@ -743,7 +877,7 @@ static int __init einj_init(void)
> }
>
> einj_param = einj_get_parameter_address();
> - if ((param_extension || acpi5) && einj_param) {
> + if ((param_extension || acpi5 || einjv2_supp) && einj_param) {
> debugfs_create_x32("flags", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
> &error_flags);
> debugfs_create_x64("param1", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
> @@ -754,6 +888,8 @@ static int __init einj_init(void)
> &error_param3);
> debugfs_create_x64("param4", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
> &error_param4);
> + debugfs_create_x64("param5", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, einj_debug_dir,
> + &error_param5);
> debugfs_create_x32("notrigger", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR,
> einj_debug_dir, &notrigger);
> }
> diff --git a/include/acpi/actbl1.h b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
> index 58b0490a2ad12e26cab30209e461429a1f5dec30..de89c18f3443489683c9aafaf6a894e60d98374b 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/actbl1.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/actbl1.h
> @@ -1026,7 +1026,9 @@ enum acpi_einj_actions {
> ACPI_EINJ_GET_COMMAND_STATUS = 7,
> ACPI_EINJ_SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS = 8,
> ACPI_EINJ_GET_EXECUTE_TIMINGS = 9,
> - ACPI_EINJ_ACTION_RESERVED = 10, /* 10 and greater are reserved */
> + ACPI_EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE = 0x10,
> + ACPI_EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE = 0x11,
> + ACPI_EINJ_ACTION_RESERVED = 0x12, /* 12 and greater are reserved */
> ACPI_EINJ_TRIGGER_ERROR = 0xFF /* Except for this value */
> };
>

2023-09-03 13:42:37

by Zaid Alali

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: EINJV2 support added

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 09:00:51PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > +An error injection example::
> > +
> > + # cd /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj
> > + # cat available_error_type # See which errors can be injected
> > + 0x00000001 EINJV2 Processor Error
> > + 0x00000002 EINJV2 Memory Error
> > + 0x00000004 EINJV2 PCI Express Error
> > + # echo 0x2 > error_type
> > + # echo 0x5 > flags
> > + # echo 0x12345000 > param1
> > + # echo 0x2 > param5
> > + # echo 1 > error_inject
> >
> > Is the expectation that platforms that implement EINJV2 will not include legacy
> > EINJ support?
>
> I spoke to some BIOS folks here. They said that the ACPI 6.5 change is an
> extension to the action table with new opcodes for GET/SET when EINJV2
> is supported. The legacy actions are not deprecated. So platform firmware could
> support both old and new injection formats.
>
> So I'm going to double down on this:
>
> > Maybe it would be better to change the top-level directory to:
> >
> > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einjv2
I also think this is the best way to go to have EINJ and EINJv2 supported.
Is anyone working on implementing this? or should I give it a shot and try to
send a patch that separates the parent directory for EINJv2?
>
> and say this isn't a "maybe". The EINJV2 interface files should go
> in a new directory. The old files should continue to work (assuming
> firmware still enumerates the old available types).
>
> Simplifying the interface for EINJV2 in the new directory is an option.
> I think we should take it ... the "paramN" files that mean different
> things for different injection types were an evolution rather than a design.
>
> -Tony
>
>
>
>