2018-05-25 10:37:14

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 00/15] arm: dts: Fix OPP and cooling device properties

This fixes missing OPP and cooling device properties for CPUs for the
ARM 32 bit platforms. This is build tested by the zero day testing
infrastructure as well.

Individual maintainers can pick the patches to their SoC trees or I will
ask ARM SoC maintainers to pick them up later.

--
viresh

Viresh Kumar (15):
arm: dts: armada: Fix "#cooling-cells" property's name
arm: dts: ls1021a: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: mediatek: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: rk322x: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: uniphier: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: sun: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: exynos: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: dra74x: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: omap: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: rk3288: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs
arm: dts: berlin: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs
arm: dts: highbank: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs
arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs
arm: dts: qcom: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs
arm: dts: imx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi | 10 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 33 ++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra74x.dtsi | 10 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 16 +++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 13 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 9 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 23 +++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts | 30 +++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi | 23 +++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi | 5 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi | 3 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 14 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi | 24 +++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi | 9 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 3 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 54 +++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 30 +++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 13 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi | 9 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 9 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi | 3 +
25 files changed, 495 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062



2018-05-25 10:33:12

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 02/15] arm: dts: ls1021a: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
index c55d479971cc..f18490548c78 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <0xf01>;
clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:33:36

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 08/15] arm: dts: dra74x: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, supply, clock latency) as well to
make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra74x.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra74x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra74x.dtsi
index 91e93ab588ca..8f9df09155d8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra74x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra74x.dtsi
@@ -18,6 +18,16 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
reg = <1>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+
+ clocks = <&dpll_mpu_ck>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
+
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* From omap-cpufreq driver */
+
+ /* cooling options */
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
+
+ vbb-supply = <&abb_mpu>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:33:44

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
table.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
index 142949d7066f..e4fb31c4f0ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
@@ -98,8 +98,17 @@
reg = <1>;
clock-frequency = <1500000000>;
clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7743_CLK_Z>;
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7743_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
+
+ /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
+ operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
+ <1312500 1000000>,
+ <1125000 1000000>,
+ < 937500 1000000>,
+ < 750000 1000000>,
+ < 375000 1000000>;
};

L2_CA15: cache-controller-0 {
--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:33:57

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 15/15] arm: dts: imx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
table.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (like clocks, supply, clock latency) as
well to make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi | 5 +++
4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
index b384913c34dd..cc8ffc42d128 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
@@ -50,6 +50,29 @@
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 996000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1150000
+ >;
+ fsl,soc-operating-points = <
+ /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
+ 996000 1175000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1175000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
+ clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
+ clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
+ "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
+ arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
+ pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
+ soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts
index 65ef4cacbc71..18ae4f3be6e3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts
@@ -187,6 +187,72 @@
>;
};

+&cpu1 {
+ /*
+ * Although the imx6q fuse indicates that 1.2GHz operation is possible,
+ * the module behaves unstable at this frequency. Hence, remove the
+ * 1.2GHz operation point here.
+ */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 975000
+ >;
+ fsl,soc-operating-points = <
+ /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1175000
+ >;
+};
+
+&cpu2 {
+ /*
+ * Although the imx6q fuse indicates that 1.2GHz operation is possible,
+ * the module behaves unstable at this frequency. Hence, remove the
+ * 1.2GHz operation point here.
+ */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 975000
+ >;
+ fsl,soc-operating-points = <
+ /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1175000
+ >;
+};
+
+&cpu3 {
+ /*
+ * Although the imx6q fuse indicates that 1.2GHz operation is possible,
+ * the module behaves unstable at this frequency. Hence, remove the
+ * 1.2GHz operation point here.
+ */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 975000
+ >;
+ fsl,soc-operating-points = <
+ /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1175000
+ >;
+};
+
&ecspi1 {
cs-gpios = <&gpio2 30 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>, <&gpio3 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
index 70483ce72ba6..78b89bb1bfed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
@@ -50,25 +50,106 @@
soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
};

- cpu@1 {
+ cpu1: cpu@1 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1200000 1275000
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 975000
+ >;
+ fsl,soc-operating-points = <
+ /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
+ 1200000 1275000
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1175000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
+ clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
+ clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
+ "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
+ arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
+ pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
+ soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
};

- cpu@2 {
+ cpu2: cpu@2 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <2>;
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1200000 1275000
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 975000
+ >;
+ fsl,soc-operating-points = <
+ /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
+ 1200000 1275000
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1175000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
+ clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
+ clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
+ "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
+ arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
+ pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
+ soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
};

- cpu@3 {
+ cpu3: cpu@3 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <3>;
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1200000 1275000
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 975000
+ >;
+ fsl,soc-operating-points = <
+ /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
+ 1200000 1275000
+ 996000 1250000
+ 852000 1250000
+ 792000 1175000
+ 396000 1175000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
+ clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
+ <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
+ clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
+ "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
+ arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
+ pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
+ soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi
index 4c9877ec29f2..5434a8aa5602 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* KHz uV */
+ 996000 1075000
+ 792000 975000
+ >;
clock-frequency = <996000000>;
};
};
--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:34:30

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 14/15] arm: dts: qcom: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
table.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
index b25daf368012..8c202b359270 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
@@ -75,6 +75,14 @@
reg = <0x1>;
clocks = <&gcc GCC_APPS_CLK_SRC>;
clock-frequency = <0>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV (fixed) */
+ 48000 1100000
+ 200000 1100000
+ 500000 1100000
+ 666000 1100000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <256000>;
};

cpu@2 {
@@ -86,6 +94,14 @@
reg = <0x2>;
clocks = <&gcc GCC_APPS_CLK_SRC>;
clock-frequency = <0>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV (fixed) */
+ 48000 1100000
+ 200000 1100000
+ 500000 1100000
+ 666000 1100000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <256000>;
};

cpu@3 {
@@ -97,6 +113,14 @@
reg = <0x3>;
clocks = <&gcc GCC_APPS_CLK_SRC>;
clock-frequency = <0>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV (fixed) */
+ 48000 1100000
+ 200000 1100000
+ 500000 1100000
+ 666000 1100000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <256000>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:34:41

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 10/15] arm: dts: rk3288: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
index d7e49d29ace5..752a892847dd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
@@ -122,18 +122,72 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a12";
reg = <0x501>;
resets = <&cru SRST_CORE1>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* KHz uV */
+ 1608000 1350000
+ 1512000 1300000
+ 1416000 1200000
+ 1200000 1100000
+ 1008000 1050000
+ 816000 1000000
+ 696000 950000
+ 600000 900000
+ 408000 900000
+ 312000 900000
+ 216000 900000
+ 126000 900000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
+ clock-latency = <40000>;
+ clocks = <&cru ARMCLK>;
};
cpu2: cpu@502 {
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "arm,cortex-a12";
reg = <0x502>;
resets = <&cru SRST_CORE2>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* KHz uV */
+ 1608000 1350000
+ 1512000 1300000
+ 1416000 1200000
+ 1200000 1100000
+ 1008000 1050000
+ 816000 1000000
+ 696000 950000
+ 600000 900000
+ 408000 900000
+ 312000 900000
+ 216000 900000
+ 126000 900000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
+ clock-latency = <40000>;
+ clocks = <&cru ARMCLK>;
};
cpu3: cpu@503 {
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "arm,cortex-a12";
reg = <0x503>;
resets = <&cru SRST_CORE3>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* KHz uV */
+ 1608000 1350000
+ 1512000 1300000
+ 1416000 1200000
+ 1200000 1100000
+ 1008000 1050000
+ 816000 1000000
+ 696000 950000
+ 600000 900000
+ 408000 900000
+ 312000 900000
+ 216000 900000
+ 126000 900000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
+ clock-latency = <40000>;
+ clocks = <&cru ARMCLK>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:35:20

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 11/15] arm: dts: berlin: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
table.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, clock latency) as well to
make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi
index d575823c5750..487e9de53244 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi
@@ -81,6 +81,16 @@
device_type = "cpu";
next-level-cache = <&l2>;
reg = <1>;
+
+ clocks = <&chip_clk CLKID_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <100000>;
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1200000 1200000
+ 1000000 1200000
+ 800000 1200000
+ 600000 1200000
+ >;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
index bf3a6c9a1d34..9cd00ab53f2d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2q.dtsi
@@ -76,6 +76,17 @@
device_type = "cpu";
next-level-cache = <&l2>;
reg = <1>;
+
+ clocks = <&chip_clk CLKID_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <100000>;
+ /* Can be modified by the bootloader */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1200000 1200000
+ 1000000 1200000
+ 800000 1200000
+ 600000 1200000
+ >;
};

cpu@2 {
@@ -83,6 +94,17 @@
device_type = "cpu";
next-level-cache = <&l2>;
reg = <2>;
+
+ clocks = <&chip_clk CLKID_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <100000>;
+ /* Can be modified by the bootloader */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1200000 1200000
+ 1000000 1200000
+ 800000 1200000
+ 600000 1200000
+ >;
};

cpu@3 {
@@ -90,6 +112,17 @@
device_type = "cpu";
next-level-cache = <&l2>;
reg = <3>;
+
+ clocks = <&chip_clk CLKID_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <100000>;
+ /* Can be modified by the bootloader */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1200000 1200000
+ 1000000 1200000
+ 800000 1200000
+ 600000 1200000
+ >;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:35:46

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 06/15] arm: dts: sun: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
index c72992556a86..debc0bf22ea3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
@@ -119,18 +119,48 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1008000 1200000
+ 864000 1200000
+ 720000 1100000
+ 480000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@2 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <2>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1008000 1200000
+ 864000 1200000
+ 720000 1100000
+ 480000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@3 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <3>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1008000 1200000
+ 864000 1200000
+ 720000 1100000
+ 480000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
index e529e4ff2174..35372a0cfc8d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
@@ -122,6 +122,19 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 960000 1400000
+ 912000 1400000
+ 864000 1300000
+ 720000 1200000
+ 528000 1100000
+ 312000 1000000
+ 144000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi
index 8d278ee001e9..4e92741b24a7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi
@@ -132,21 +132,30 @@
};

cpu@1 {
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@2 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <2>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@3 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <3>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
index 41d57c76f290..9dff6887923c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
@@ -84,21 +84,30 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@2 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <2>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@3 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <3>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:35:53

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 07/15] arm: dts: exynos: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
index 962af97c1883..aff5d66ae058 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
@@ -78,6 +78,22 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
reg = <1>;
clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
+ clocks = <&cmu CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
+
+ operating-points = <
+ 1000000 1150000
+ 900000 1112500
+ 800000 1075000
+ 700000 1037500
+ 600000 1000000
+ 500000 962500
+ 400000 925000
+ 300000 887500
+ 200000 850000
+ 100000 850000
+ >;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
index 88fb47cef9a8..b6091c27f155 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
@@ -55,6 +55,19 @@
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
reg = <0x901>;
+ clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
+ clock-latency = <160000>;
+
+ operating-points = <
+ 1200000 1250000
+ 1000000 1150000
+ 800000 1075000
+ 500000 975000
+ 400000 975000
+ 200000 950000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi
index 7b43c10c510b..51f72f0327e5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi
@@ -49,21 +49,30 @@
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
reg = <0xA01>;
+ clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
};

cpu@a02 {
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
reg = <0xA02>;
+ clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
};

cpu@a03 {
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
reg = <0xA03>;
+ clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index 2daf505b3d08..69648f83b8b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -84,6 +84,29 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
reg = <1>;
clock-frequency = <1700000000>;
+ clocks = <&clock CLK_ARM_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
+ clock-latency = <140000>;
+
+ operating-points = <
+ 1700000 1300000
+ 1600000 1250000
+ 1500000 1225000
+ 1400000 1200000
+ 1300000 1150000
+ 1200000 1125000
+ 1100000 1100000
+ 1000000 1075000
+ 900000 1050000
+ 800000 1025000
+ 700000 1012500
+ 600000 1000000
+ 500000 975000
+ 400000 950000
+ 300000 937500
+ 200000 925000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:35:59

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 09/15] arm: dts: omap: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, supply, clock latency) as well to
make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
index 732b61a0e990..574ac11c0489 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
@@ -61,6 +61,20 @@
device_type = "cpu";
compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
reg = <0x1>;
+
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1000000 1060000
+ 1500000 1250000
+ >;
+
+ clocks = <&dpll_mpu_ck>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
+
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* From omap-cpufreq driver */
+
+ /* cooling options */
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:36:21

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 05/15] arm: dts: uniphier: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi
index debcbd15c24b..40ed15465095 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
enable-method = "psci";
next-level-cache = <&l2>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu2: cpu@2 {
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
enable-method = "psci";
next-level-cache = <&l2>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu3: cpu@3 {
@@ -56,6 +58,7 @@
enable-method = "psci";
next-level-cache = <&l2>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:36:21

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 12/15] arm: dts: highbank: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
table.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts
index ed14aeac0566..50278715de76 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts
@@ -56,6 +56,16 @@
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
clocks = <&a9pll>;
clock-names = "cpu";
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz ignored */
+ 1300000 1000000
+ 1200000 1000000
+ 1100000 1000000
+ 800000 1000000
+ 400000 1000000
+ 200000 1000000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <100000>;
};

cpu@902 {
@@ -65,6 +75,16 @@
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
clocks = <&a9pll>;
clock-names = "cpu";
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz ignored */
+ 1300000 1000000
+ 1200000 1000000
+ 1100000 1000000
+ 800000 1000000
+ 400000 1000000
+ 200000 1000000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <100000>;
};

cpu@903 {
@@ -74,6 +94,16 @@
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
clocks = <&a9pll>;
clock-names = "cpu";
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz ignored */
+ 1300000 1000000
+ 1200000 1000000
+ 1100000 1000000
+ 800000 1000000
+ 400000 1000000
+ 200000 1000000
+ >;
+ clock-latency = <100000>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:36:41

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 04/15] arm: dts: rk322x: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
index be80e9a2c9af..ef414e39bf3a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
reg = <0xf01>;
resets = <&cru SRST_CORE1>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
enable-method = "psci";
};

@@ -89,6 +90,7 @@
reg = <0xf02>;
resets = <&cru SRST_CORE2>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
enable-method = "psci";
};

@@ -98,6 +100,7 @@
reg = <0xf03>;
resets = <&cru SRST_CORE3>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
enable-method = "psci";
};
};
--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:36:53

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 03/15] arm: dts: mediatek: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
index d1eb123bc73b..1cdc346a05e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
<&apmixedsys CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL>;
clock-names = "cpu", "intermediate";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
};

@@ -103,6 +104,7 @@
<&apmixedsys CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL>;
clock-names = "cpu", "intermediate";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
};

@@ -114,6 +116,7 @@
<&apmixedsys CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL>;
clock-names = "cpu", "intermediate";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
};
};
--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 10:37:26

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] arm: dts: armada: Fix "#cooling-cells" property's name

It should be "#cooling-cells" instead of "cooling-cells". Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts
index 6782ce481ac9..d8769956cbfc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
3700 5
3900 6
4000 7>;
- cooling-cells = <2>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

gpio-leds {
--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-25 11:47:17

by Lucas Stach

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm: dts: imx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

Hi Viresh,

Am Freitag, den 25.05.2018, 16:02 +0530 schrieb Viresh Kumar:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (like clocks, supply, clock latency) as
> well to make it all work.

This is a lot of duplicate information for what is effectively a shared
cluster wide thing. This does absolutely not _feel_ right.

What problem are you solving here? Why do we need all this duplicate
information? Why can't we fix it by falling back to looking at cpu0 if
needed?

Regards,
Lucas

> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi      | 23 ++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi       | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi       |  5 +++
>  4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> index b384913c34dd..cc8ffc42d128 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi
> @@ -50,6 +50,29 @@
> >   device_type = "cpu";
> >   reg = <1>;
> >   next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> > + operating-points = <
> > + /* kHz    uV */
> > + 996000  1250000
> > + 792000  1175000
> > + 396000  1150000
> > + >;
> > + fsl,soc-operating-points = <
> > + /* ARM kHz  SOC-PU uV */
> > > + 996000 1175000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 1175000
> > + >;
> > + clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> > + clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
> > + clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
> > +       "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
> > + arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
> > + pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
> > + soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
> >   };
> >   };
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts
> index 65ef4cacbc71..18ae4f3be6e3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-cm-fx6.dts
> @@ -187,6 +187,72 @@
> >   >;
>  };
>  
> +&cpu1 {
> > + /*
> > +  * Although the imx6q fuse indicates that 1.2GHz operation is possible,
> > +  * the module behaves unstable at this frequency. Hence, remove the
> > +  * 1.2GHz operation point here.
> > +  */
> > + operating-points = <
> > > + /* kHz uV */
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 975000
> > + >;
> > + fsl,soc-operating-points = <
> > > + /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 1175000
> > + >;
> +};
> +
> +&cpu2 {
> > + /*
> > +  * Although the imx6q fuse indicates that 1.2GHz operation is possible,
> > +  * the module behaves unstable at this frequency. Hence, remove the
> > +  * 1.2GHz operation point here.
> > +  */
> > + operating-points = <
> > > + /* kHz uV */
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 975000
> > + >;
> > + fsl,soc-operating-points = <
> > > + /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 1175000
> > + >;
> +};
> +
> +&cpu3 {
> > + /*
> > +  * Although the imx6q fuse indicates that 1.2GHz operation is possible,
> > +  * the module behaves unstable at this frequency. Hence, remove the
> > +  * 1.2GHz operation point here.
> > +  */
> > + operating-points = <
> > > + /* kHz uV */
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 975000
> > + >;
> > + fsl,soc-operating-points = <
> > > + /* ARM kHz SOC-PU uV */
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 1175000
> > + >;
> +};
> +
>  &ecspi1 {
> >   cs-gpios = <&gpio2 30 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>, <&gpio3 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >   pinctrl-names = "default";
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> index 70483ce72ba6..78b89bb1bfed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
> @@ -50,25 +50,106 @@
> >   soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
> >   };
>  
> > - cpu@1 {
> > > + cpu1: cpu@1 {
> >   compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> >   device_type = "cpu";
> >   reg = <1>;
> >   next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> > + operating-points = <
> > + /* kHz    uV */
> > + 1200000 1275000
> > + 996000  1250000
> > + 852000  1250000
> > + 792000  1175000
> > + 396000  975000
> > + >;
> > + fsl,soc-operating-points = <
> > + /* ARM kHz  SOC-PU uV */
> > + 1200000 1275000
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 1175000
> > + >;
> > + clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> > + clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
> > + clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
> > +       "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
> > + arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
> > + pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
> > + soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
> >   };
>  
> > - cpu@2 {
> > > + cpu2: cpu@2 {
> >   compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> >   device_type = "cpu";
> >   reg = <2>;
> >   next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> > + operating-points = <
> > + /* kHz    uV */
> > + 1200000 1275000
> > + 996000  1250000
> > + 852000  1250000
> > + 792000  1175000
> > + 396000  975000
> > + >;
> > + fsl,soc-operating-points = <
> > + /* ARM kHz  SOC-PU uV */
> > + 1200000 1275000
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 1175000
> > + >;
> > + clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> > + clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
> > + clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
> > +       "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
> > + arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
> > + pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
> > + soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
> >   };
>  
> > - cpu@3 {
> > > + cpu3: cpu@3 {
> >   compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> >   device_type = "cpu";
> >   reg = <3>;
> >   next-level-cache = <&L2>;
> > + operating-points = <
> > + /* kHz    uV */
> > + 1200000 1275000
> > + 996000  1250000
> > + 852000  1250000
> > + 792000  1175000
> > + 396000  975000
> > + >;
> > + fsl,soc-operating-points = <
> > + /* ARM kHz  SOC-PU uV */
> > + 1200000 1275000
> > > + 996000 1250000
> > > + 852000 1250000
> > > + 792000 1175000
> > > + 396000 1175000
> > + >;
> > + clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> > + clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_ARM>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL2_PFD2_396M>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_STEP>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SW>,
> > +  <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL1_SYS>;
> > + clock-names = "arm", "pll2_pfd2_396m", "step",
> > +       "pll1_sw", "pll1_sys";
> > + arm-supply = <&reg_arm>;
> > + pu-supply = <&reg_pu>;
> > + soc-supply = <&reg_soc>;
> >   };
> >   };
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi
> index 4c9877ec29f2..5434a8aa5602 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d.dtsi
> @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
> >   compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> >   device_type = "cpu";
> >   reg = <1>;
> > + operating-points = <
> > > + /* KHz uV */
> > > + 996000 1075000
> > > + 792000 975000
> > + >;
> >   clock-frequency = <996000000>;
> >   };
> >   };

2018-05-28 08:45:43

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] arm: dts: sun: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

Hi,

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:52PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

The prefix should be sunxi and not sun, but it looks good to me
otherwise.

Let me know what your preferred merge method is.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Attachments:
(No filename) (1.00 kB)
 signature.asc (849.00 B)
 Download all attachments

2018-05-28 09:24:29

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

[Cc Biju Das]

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:59PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Thanks, this looks good to me and it looks like it should have:

Fixes: 0417814ea140 ("ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add OPP table for frequency scaling")

Biju, as the author of the above patch could you take a look over this fix?

> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
> index 142949d7066f..e4fb31c4f0ee 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
> @@ -98,8 +98,17 @@
> reg = <1>;
> clock-frequency = <1500000000>;
> clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7743_CLK_Z>;
> + clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
> power-domains = <&sysc R8A7743_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
> next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
> +
> + /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
> + operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
> + <1312500 1000000>,
> + <1125000 1000000>,
> + < 937500 1000000>,
> + < 750000 1000000>,
> + < 375000 1000000>;
> };
>
> L2_CA15: cache-controller-0 {
> --
> 2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062
>

2018-05-28 11:00:07

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On 28-05-18, 11:23, Simon Horman wrote:
> [Cc Biju Das]
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:59PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> > for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> > subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> > as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> > will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> > the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> > table.
> >
> > Add such missing properties.
> >
> > Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> > work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks, this looks good to me and it looks like it should have:
>
> Fixes: 0417814ea140 ("ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add OPP table for frequency scaling")

Sure.

Will you be picking this patch directly and send it part of your pull
request ? Maybe add Fixes tag then only ?

--
viresh

2018-05-28 12:00:20

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm: dts: imx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

Hi Lucas,

On 25-05-18, 13:46, Lucas Stach wrote:
> This is a lot of duplicate information for what is effectively a shared
> cluster wide thing. This does absolutely not _feel_ right.

I cannot agree more :)

> What problem are you solving here? Why do we need all this duplicate
> information? Why can't we fix it by falling back to looking at cpu0 if
> needed?

Let me try explaining one of the problem scenarios to you as your
platform is a single cluster one. Make cpufreq driver as module, don't
insert it, hotplug out CPU0 and now insert the cpufreq driver. The
cpufreq core will try adding the cpufreq policy for CPU1 but wouldn't
find the required information in the DT node of CPU1 and so will fail
or behave incorrectly.

We can't look at CPU0 as we don't know they are related at all.
Nothing tells that to us. The right solution to fix the duplication is
to move to OPP-v2 bindings, which allow us to create a single OPP
table node and refer to it from all the CPU nodes. Because in case of
imx platforms getting updated here, we use the old and some platforms
specific frequency tables, we have to duplicate it everywhere.

But looking from DT otherwise, all the device should anyway have all
the information required right in their node. That can be simplified
with things like phandle to opp-v2 node, but still everything needs to
be there. We shouldn't really rely on other CPU nodes to make it work.
That would be an incomplete definition of the hardware IMHO.

--
viresh

2018-05-28 12:00:55

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:28:31PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28-05-18, 11:23, Simon Horman wrote:
> > [Cc Biju Das]
> >
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:59PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> > > for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> > > subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> > > as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> > > will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> > > the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> > > table.
> > >
> > > Add such missing properties.
> > >
> > > Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> > > work.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks, this looks good to me and it looks like it should have:
> >
> > Fixes: 0417814ea140 ("ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add OPP table for frequency scaling")
>
> Sure.
>
> Will you be picking this patch directly and send it part of your pull
> request ? Maybe add Fixes tag then only ?

Yes, that is my plan. I can handle adding the Fixes tag.
But I'll wait to see if Bjiu has an feedback first.

2018-05-28 12:45:39

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] arm: dts: sun: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On 28-05-18, 10:44, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:52PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> > "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> > of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> > a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> > brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> > because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> > it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
> >
> > Add such missing properties.
> >
> > Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> > make it all work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
>
> The prefix should be sunxi and not sun, but it looks good to me
> otherwise.
>
> Let me know what your preferred merge method is.

Please pick it up directly and send it as part of your pull request.
Do you want me to resend or can you fix the $subject ?

Thanks.

--
viresh

2018-05-28 14:57:00

by Gregory CLEMENT

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] arm: dts: armada: Fix "#cooling-cells" property's name

Hi Viresh,

On ven., mai 25 2018, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:

> It should be "#cooling-cells" instead of "cooling-cells". Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>


Applied on mvebu/fixes

Thanks,

Gregory

> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts
> index 6782ce481ac9..d8769956cbfc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-synology-ds116.dts
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
> 3700 5
> 3900 6
> 4000 7>;
> - cooling-cells = <2>;
> + #cooling-cells = <2>;
> };
>
> gpio-leds {
> --
> 2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062
>

--
Gregory Clement, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com

2018-05-29 13:21:23

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] arm: dts: exynos: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order.

Thanks for the patch.

In case of Exynos, the booting CPU always has these information in DT
and the booting CPU cannot be changed (chosen by firmware/hardware
configuration). Therefore there is no real risk of falling although
for correctness of DT your change makes sense.

It is too late for this cycle for me so I'll pick it up after merge window.
Alternatively, arm-soc guys can pick it up directly with my tag:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


> For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>

2018-05-29 13:35:42

by Biju Das

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 13/15] arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

Hi All,

I have tested this patch on RZ/G1M and I didn't find any issues. r8a7743 is similar to r8a7791. So I assume you will apply the same patch for other R-SoC devices as well.

Apart from this, maybe we need to update the OPP binding documentation. i.e., extend the operating- point usage to other cores in the cluster (Binding 1: operating-points).

Regards,
Biju

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 28 May 2018 12:59
> To: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Magnus Damm <[email protected]>; Rob
> Herring <[email protected]>; Mark Rutland <[email protected]>;
> Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; Biju Das <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for
> CPUs
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:28:31PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 28-05-18, 11:23, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > [Cc Biju Das]
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:59PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be
> > > > present for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are
> > > > present only for a subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will
> > > > start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are brought online in a
> > > > different order. For example, this will happen because the
> > > > operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node it is
> > > > trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP table.
> > > >
> > > > Add such missing properties.
> > > >
> > > > Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> > > > work.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Thanks, this looks good to me and it looks like it should have:
> > >
> > > Fixes: 0417814ea140 ("ARM: dts: r8a7743: Add OPP table for frequency
> > > scaling")
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> > Will you be picking this patch directly and send it part of your pull
> > request ? Maybe add Fixes tag then only ?
>
> Yes, that is my plan. I can handle adding the Fixes tag.
> But I'll wait to see if Bjiu has an feedback first.



Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.

2018-05-30 04:38:54

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] arm: dts: exynos: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On 29-05-18, 15:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> In case of Exynos, the booting CPU always has these information in DT
> and the booting CPU cannot be changed (chosen by firmware/hardware
> configuration).

But can the booting CPU be offlined ?

If yes, then this is how things are broken right now.

Build cpufreq driver as module, boot kernel, hotplug out CPU0, insert
cpufreq driver and that will try to find these properties in CPU1.

> Therefore there is no real risk of falling although
> for correctness of DT your change makes sense.
>
> It is too late for this cycle for me so I'll pick it up after merge window.
> Alternatively, arm-soc guys can pick it up directly with my tag:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>

No worries, you can pick it up later on.

--
viresh

2018-05-30 04:47:48

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 13/15] arm: dts: r8a77xx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
table.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (like, clock latency, voltage tolerance,
etc) as well to make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
index 142949d7066f..e4fb31c4f0ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7743.dtsi
@@ -98,8 +98,17 @@
reg = <1>;
clock-frequency = <1500000000>;
clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7743_CLK_Z>;
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7743_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
+
+ /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
+ operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
+ <1312500 1000000>,
+ <1125000 1000000>,
+ < 937500 1000000>,
+ < 750000 1000000>,
+ < 375000 1000000>;
};

L2_CA15: cache-controller-0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
index 4d06b154bd7e..c4324b1a2ec4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
@@ -79,12 +79,12 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
reg = <0>;
clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
- voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7790_CLK_Z>;
- clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7790_PD_CA15_CPU0>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */

/* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
operating-points = <1400000 1000000>,
@@ -104,6 +104,16 @@
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7790_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
+
+ /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
+ operating-points = <1400000 1000000>,
+ <1225000 1000000>,
+ <1050000 1000000>,
+ < 875000 1000000>,
+ < 700000 1000000>,
+ < 350000 1000000>;
};

cpu2: cpu@2 {
@@ -115,6 +125,16 @@
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7790_PD_CA15_CPU2>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
+
+ /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
+ operating-points = <1400000 1000000>,
+ <1225000 1000000>,
+ <1050000 1000000>,
+ < 875000 1000000>,
+ < 700000 1000000>,
+ < 350000 1000000>;
};

cpu3: cpu@3 {
@@ -126,6 +146,16 @@
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7790_PD_CA15_CPU3>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
+
+ /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
+ operating-points = <1400000 1000000>,
+ <1225000 1000000>,
+ <1050000 1000000>,
+ < 875000 1000000>,
+ < 700000 1000000>,
+ < 350000 1000000>;
};

cpu4: cpu@100 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
index 6e1dd7ad7bd6..d1d726a1364a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
@@ -78,11 +78,11 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
reg = <0>;
clock-frequency = <1500000000>;
- voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7791_CLK_Z>;
- clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7791_PD_CA15_CPU0>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */

/* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
@@ -101,6 +101,16 @@
clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7791_CLK_Z>;
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7791_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
+
+ /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
+ operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
+ <1312500 1000000>,
+ <1125000 1000000>,
+ < 937500 1000000>,
+ < 750000 1000000>,
+ < 375000 1000000>;
};

L2_CA15: cache-controller-0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
index 4abecfc0ca98..1e6439b85a6b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
@@ -70,10 +70,10 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
reg = <0>;
clock-frequency = <1500000000>;
- voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7793_CLK_Z>;
- clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7793_PD_CA15_CPU0>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */

/* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
@@ -92,6 +92,17 @@
clock-frequency = <1500000000>;
clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7793_CLK_Z>;
power-domains = <&sysc R8A7793_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
+ voltage-tolerance = <1>; /* 1% */
+ clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
+
+ /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
+ operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
+ <1312500 1000000>,
+ <1125000 1000000>,
+ < 937500 1000000>,
+ < 750000 1000000>,
+ < 375000 1000000>;
+ next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
};

L2_CA15: cache-controller-0 {
--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-05-30 04:48:34

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] arm: dts: r8a7743: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On 29-05-18, 13:33, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tested this patch on RZ/G1M and I didn't find any issues.
> r8a7743 is similar to r8a7791. So I assume you will apply the same
> patch for other R-SoC devices as well.

Okay, I have sent V2 for this and it fixes all those platforms as
well.

> Apart from this, maybe we need to update the OPP binding
> documentation. i.e., extend the operating- point usage to other
> cores in the cluster (Binding 1: operating-points).

Its already done, you need to start using operating-points-v2 property
to avoid duplication like this.

--
viresh

2018-05-30 12:33:56

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] arm: dts: exynos: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29-05-18, 15:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> In case of Exynos, the booting CPU always has these information in DT
>> and the booting CPU cannot be changed (chosen by firmware/hardware
>> configuration).
>
> But can the booting CPU be offlined ?
>
> If yes, then this is how things are broken right now.
>
> Build cpufreq driver as module, boot kernel, hotplug out CPU0, insert
> cpufreq driver and that will try to find these properties in CPU1.

OK, I see the possibility although it is still far away from use
cases. You cannot hotplug booting CPU (CPU0) on Exynos kernels. It
never worked. Strictly speaking - offlining will work. But bringing it
online will likely hang the system.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

2018-05-31 05:24:34

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] arm: dts: exynos: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On 30-05-18, 14:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> OK, I see the possibility although it is still far away from use
> cases. You cannot hotplug booting CPU (CPU0) on Exynos kernels. It
> never worked. Strictly speaking - offlining will work. But bringing it
> online will likely hang the system.

True and I used the following out of tree patch for a long time for my
dual A15 exynos to make hotplug work.

https://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/backup/linux.git/commit/?h=bkp/exynos/hotplug&id=aab8a906a70b8f1fb15a4b7bd2ee27e6dcabf79d

--
viresh

2018-06-01 11:54:01

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] arm: dts: r8a77xx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:16:58AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (like, clock latency, voltage tolerance,
> etc) as well to make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

This looks fine but I will wait to see if there are other reviews before
applying.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>

2018-06-01 15:18:45

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] arm: dts: sun: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

Hi,

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:27:34PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28-05-18, 10:44, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:52PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> > > "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> > > of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> > > a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> > > brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> > > because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> > > it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
> > >
> > > Add such missing properties.
> > >
> > > Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> > > make it all work.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> >
> > The prefix should be sunxi and not sun, but it looks good to me
> > otherwise.
> >
> > Let me know what your preferred merge method is.
>
> Please pick it up directly and send it as part of your pull request.
> Do you want me to resend or can you fix the $subject ?

I just tried to apply it, and it failed. We have usually two different
PR for the H3 SoCs and the others. Could you split the H3 in a
separate patch (and fix the subject in the process?)

Thanks!
Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Attachments:
(No filename) (1.52 kB)
 signature.asc (849.00 B)
 Download all attachments

2018-06-04 09:58:48

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] arm: dts: r8a77xx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:16:58AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (like, clock latency, voltage tolerance,
> etc) as well to make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Thanks, I took the liberty of changing the prefix of this patch to
"ARM: dts: r8a77(43|9[013]):" when applying this patch.

2018-06-05 04:57:36

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm: dts: sunxi: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
make it all work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
V2:
- Separated patch for h3
- Fixed subject s/sun/sunxi/

arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
index c72992556a86..debc0bf22ea3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
@@ -119,18 +119,48 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1008000 1200000
+ 864000 1200000
+ 720000 1100000
+ 480000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@2 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <2>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1008000 1200000
+ 864000 1200000
+ 720000 1100000
+ 480000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@3 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <3>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 1008000 1200000
+ 864000 1200000
+ 720000 1100000
+ 480000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
index e529e4ff2174..35372a0cfc8d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
@@ -122,6 +122,19 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPU>;
+ clock-latency = <244144>; /* 8 32k periods */
+ operating-points = <
+ /* kHz uV */
+ 960000 1400000
+ 912000 1400000
+ 864000 1300000
+ 720000 1200000
+ 528000 1100000
+ 312000 1000000
+ 144000 1000000
+ >;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi
index 8d278ee001e9..4e92741b24a7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi
@@ -132,21 +132,30 @@
};

cpu@1 {
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@2 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <2>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@3 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <3>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-06-05 04:58:44

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] arm: dts: sun8i-h3: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
"dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.

Add such missing properties.

Fix other missing properties (clocks, clock-names) as well to make it all
work.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
V2: Separated patch for h3.

arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
index 41d57c76f290..9dff6887923c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
@@ -84,21 +84,30 @@
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <1>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@2 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <2>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};

cpu@3 {
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <3>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_CPUX>;
+ clock-names = "cpu";
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
+ #cooling-cells = <2>;
};
};

--
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062


2018-06-05 07:13:47

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm: dts: sunxi: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:17:49AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Applied both, thanks!
Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Attachments:
(No filename) (905.00 B)
 signature.asc (849.00 B)
 Download all attachments

2018-06-05 16:03:56

by Chen-Yu Tsai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm: dts: sunxi: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:17:49AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
>> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
>> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
>> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
>> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
>> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
>> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>>
>> Add such missing properties.
>>
>> Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
>> make it all work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
>
> Applied both, thanks!

Please fix the "ARM" prefix when applying. :)

ChenYu

2018-06-06 06:59:07

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm: dts: sunxi: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 12:02:20AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:17:49AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> >> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> >> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> >> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> >> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> >> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> >> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
> >>
> >> Add such missing properties.
> >>
> >> Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> >> make it all work.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> >
> > Applied both, thanks!
>
> Please fix the "ARM" prefix when applying. :)

Done, thanks for the reminder :)

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Attachments:
(No filename) (1.17 kB)
 signature.asc (849.00 B)
 Download all attachments

2018-06-11 09:27:32

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] arm: dts: r8a77xx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:47 AM Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (like, clock latency, voltage tolerance,
> etc) as well to make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2018-06-17 14:48:06

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] arm: dts: rk322x: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2018, 12:31:50 CEST schrieb Viresh Kumar:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

applied for 4.19

Thanks
Heiko



2018-06-17 14:49:01

by Heiko Stuebner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] arm: dts: rk3288: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2018, 12:31:56 CEST schrieb Viresh Kumar:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

applied for 4.19, after adapting the patch to the opp-v2 conversion
I Cc'ed you on [for your reference].


Thanks
Heiko



2018-06-20 18:46:12

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] arm: dts: exynos: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:53PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (clocks, OPP, clock latency) as well to
> make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>

Thanks, applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2018-06-25 15:00:07

by Matthias Brugger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] arm: dts: mediatek: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs



On 25/05/18 12:31, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

pushed to v4.18-next/dts32

Thanks

> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
> index d1eb123bc73b..1cdc346a05e8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
> <&apmixedsys CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL>;
> clock-names = "cpu", "intermediate";
> operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
> + #cooling-cells = <2>;
> clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
> };
>
> @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@
> <&apmixedsys CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL>;
> clock-names = "cpu", "intermediate";
> operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
> + #cooling-cells = <2>;
> clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
> };
>
> @@ -114,6 +116,7 @@
> <&apmixedsys CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL>;
> clock-names = "cpu", "intermediate";
> operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
> + #cooling-cells = <2>;
> clock-frequency = <1300000000>;
> };
> };
>

2018-07-02 20:26:45

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] arm: dts: highbank: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:32 AM Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

ARM-SOC maintainers, Please apply this.

Rob

2018-07-02 23:28:54

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] arm: dts: highbank: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:25:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:32 AM Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> > for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> > subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> > as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> > will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> > the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> > table.
> >
> > Add such missing properties.
> >
> > Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> > work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
>
> ARM-SOC maintainers, Please apply this.

Applied to next/dt.


-Olof

2018-07-03 01:36:31

by Shawn Guo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] arm: dts: ls1021a: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:01:48PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks.

2018-07-03 04:15:32

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] arm: dts: highbank: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On 02-07-18, 16:27, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:25:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:32 AM Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> > > for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> > > subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> > > as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> > > will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> > > the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> > > table.
> > >
> > > Add such missing properties.
> > >
> > > Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> > > work.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> >
> > ARM-SOC maintainers, Please apply this.
>
> Applied to next/dt.

Thanks Olof.

Can you also apply other patches in this series, that haven't been
applied yet by SoC maintainers ? And same for the arm64 series..

--
viresh

2018-07-03 06:44:46

by Tony Lindgren

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] arm: dts: dra74x: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

* Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> [180525 03:35]:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (clocks, supply, clock latency) as well to
> make it all work.

Applying this one into omap-for-v4.19/dt thanks.

Regards,

Tony

2018-07-03 06:45:48

by Tony Lindgren

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] arm: dts: omap: Add missing cooling device properties for CPUs

* Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> [180525 03:35]:
> The cooling device properties, like "#cooling-cells" and
> "dynamic-power-coefficient", should either be present for all the CPUs
> of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a subset of CPUs of
> a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon as the CPUs are
> brought online in a different order. For example, this will happen
> because the operating system looks for such properties in the CPU node
> it is trying to bring up, so that it can register a cooling device.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (clocks, supply, clock latency) as well to
> make it all work.

Applying this too into omap-for-v4.19/dt thanks.

Tony

2018-07-03 07:13:30

by Shawn Guo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm: dts: imx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:37:39PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On 25-05-18, 13:46, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > This is a lot of duplicate information for what is effectively a shared
> > cluster wide thing. This does absolutely not _feel_ right.
>
> I cannot agree more :)
>
> > What problem are you solving here? Why do we need all this duplicate
> > information? Why can't we fix it by falling back to looking at cpu0 if
> > needed?
>
> Let me try explaining one of the problem scenarios to you as your
> platform is a single cluster one. Make cpufreq driver as module, don't
> insert it, hotplug out CPU0 and now insert the cpufreq driver. The
> cpufreq core will try adding the cpufreq policy for CPU1 but wouldn't
> find the required information in the DT node of CPU1 and so will fail
> or behave incorrectly.
>
> We can't look at CPU0 as we don't know they are related at all.
> Nothing tells that to us. The right solution to fix the duplication is
> to move to OPP-v2 bindings, which allow us to create a single OPP
> table node and refer to it from all the CPU nodes. Because in case of
> imx platforms getting updated here, we use the old and some platforms
> specific frequency tables, we have to duplicate it everywhere.
>
> But looking from DT otherwise, all the device should anyway have all
> the information required right in their node. That can be simplified
> with things like phandle to opp-v2 node, but still everything needs to
> be there. We shouldn't really rely on other CPU nodes to make it work.
> That would be an incomplete definition of the hardware IMHO.

Lucas,

Are you fine with the patch now considering the respond from Viresh?

Shawn

2018-07-03 08:59:12

by Lucas Stach

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm: dts: imx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

Hi Shawn,

Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2018, 15:12 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:37:39PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On 25-05-18, 13:46, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > This is a lot of duplicate information for what is effectively a shared
> > >  cluster wide thing. This does absolutely not _feel_ right.
> >
> > I cannot agree more :)
> >
> > > What problem are you solving here? Why do we need all this duplicate
> > > information? Why can't we fix it by falling back to looking at cpu0 if
> > > needed?
> >
> > Let me try explaining one of the problem scenarios to you as your
> > platform is a single cluster one. Make cpufreq driver as module, don't
> > insert it, hotplug out CPU0 and now insert the cpufreq driver. The
> > cpufreq core will try adding the cpufreq policy for CPU1 but wouldn't
> > find the required information in the DT node of CPU1 and so will fail
> > or behave incorrectly.
> >
> > We can't look at CPU0 as we don't know they are related at all.
> > Nothing tells that to us. The right solution to fix the duplication is
> > to move to OPP-v2 bindings, which allow us to create a single OPP
> > table node and refer to it from all the CPU nodes. Because in case of
> > imx platforms getting updated here, we use the old and some platforms
> > specific frequency tables, we have to duplicate it everywhere.
> >
> > But looking from DT otherwise, all the device should anyway have all
> > the information required right in their node. That can be simplified
> > with things like phandle to opp-v2 node, but still everything needs to
> > be there. We shouldn't really rely on other CPU nodes to make it work.
> > That would be an incomplete definition of the hardware IMHO.
>
> Lucas,
>
> Are you fine with the patch now considering the respond from Viresh?

I still don't like the huge duplication of information in the DT, but I
agree that it's currently necessary for correctness. Long term I hope
we can get away from cpufreq-imx6 and the custom SoC OPPs, which would
allow us to switch over to OPPv2.

So patch is:
Reluctantly-acked-by: Lucas Stach <[email protected]>

Regards,
Lucas

2018-07-03 12:36:45

by Shawn Guo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm: dts: imx: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:02:01PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing properties (like clocks, supply, clock latency) as
> well to make it all work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks.

2018-07-03 14:47:46

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] arm: dts: highbank: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02-07-18, 16:27, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:25:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:32 AM Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
>> > > for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
>> > > subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
>> > > as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
>> > > will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
>> > > the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
>> > > table.
>> > >
>> > > Add such missing properties.
>> > >
>> > > Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
>> > > work.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
>> > > ---
>> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/highbank.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > ARM-SOC maintainers, Please apply this.
>>
>> Applied to next/dt.
>
> Thanks Olof.
>
> Can you also apply other patches in this series, that haven't been
> applied yet by SoC maintainers ? And same for the arm64 series..

This is the kind of patch that should be applied by the maintainers
for active platforms, where they have systems to test with and can
make sure you haven't regressed something on them.

For very low patch rate platforms we can apply directly through
maintainer acks, like in this case.

So, my recommendation is to repost the series to the maintainers.
Please don't patchbomb [email protected] though, so keep us off of cc by
default (you can add our individual addresses if you want).


Thanks,

-Olof

2018-07-18 06:09:03

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] arm: dts: qcom: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On 25-05-18, 16:02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

Qcom maintainers, can you please apply this one ?

--
viresh

2018-07-18 10:23:20

by Amit Kucheria

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] arm: dts: qcom: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> table.
>
> Add such missing properties.
>
> Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>

> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
> index b25daf368012..8c202b359270 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019.dtsi
> @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@
> reg = <0x1>;
> clocks = <&gcc GCC_APPS_CLK_SRC>;
> clock-frequency = <0>;
> + operating-points = <
> + /* kHz uV (fixed) */
> + 48000 1100000
> + 200000 1100000
> + 500000 1100000
> + 666000 1100000
> + >;
> + clock-latency = <256000>;
> };
>
> cpu@2 {
> @@ -86,6 +94,14 @@
> reg = <0x2>;
> clocks = <&gcc GCC_APPS_CLK_SRC>;
> clock-frequency = <0>;
> + operating-points = <
> + /* kHz uV (fixed) */
> + 48000 1100000
> + 200000 1100000
> + 500000 1100000
> + 666000 1100000
> + >;
> + clock-latency = <256000>;
> };
>
> cpu@3 {
> @@ -97,6 +113,14 @@
> reg = <0x3>;
> clocks = <&gcc GCC_APPS_CLK_SRC>;
> clock-frequency = <0>;
> + operating-points = <
> + /* kHz uV (fixed) */
> + 48000 1100000
> + 200000 1100000
> + 500000 1100000
> + 666000 1100000
> + >;
> + clock-latency = <256000>;
> };
> };
>
> --
> 2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

2018-07-21 18:59:44

by Andy Gross

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] arm: dts: qcom: Add missing OPP properties for CPUs

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:52:26PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The OPP properties, like "operating-points", should either be present
> > for all the CPUs of a cluster or none. If these are present only for a
> > subset of CPUs of a cluster then things will start falling apart as soon
> > as the CPUs are brought online in a different order. For example, this
> > will happen because the operating system looks for such properties in
> > the CPU node it is trying to bring up, so that it can create an OPP
> > table.
> >
> > Add such missing properties.
> >
> > Fix other missing property (clock latency) as well to make it all
> > work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
>
> FWIW,
> Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>

Picking this up for 4.19. thanks.

Andy