2016-03-16 00:46:56

by Kuninori Morimoto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: tidyup IPSR/MOD_SEL/GPSR settings order


Hi Geert, Laurent

Gen2 / Gen3 next datasheet will has below note.
Our current PFC settings order is
MOD_SEL -> GPSR -> IPSR
But, this fixes it to
MOD_SEL -> IPSR -> GPSR

------------
IPSRx and MOD_SELx registers shall be set before setting GPSRx
registers in case that they need to be configured.
MOD_SELx registers can be set either earlier or later than setting
IPSRx registers.
------------

1) patch make it easy to check
2) patch fixes above

Kuninori Morimoto (2):
1) pinctrl: sh-pfc: enable to indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL for debug
2) pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx

drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c | 3 ++-
drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 11 +++++++----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)



Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto


2016-03-16 00:47:59

by Kuninori Morimoto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: enable to indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL for debug

From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>

Current sh_pfc can't indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL name for debug.
Of course we can get it from indicated register address, but it
is not convenient. This patch enables to indicate these.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c | 3 ++-
drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 9 ++++++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
index 0c2d14c..c59f858 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
@@ -204,8 +204,9 @@ static void sh_pfc_write_config_reg(struct sh_pfc *pfc,

sh_pfc_config_reg_helper(pfc, crp, field, &mapped_reg, &mask, &pos);

- dev_dbg(pfc->dev, "write_reg addr = %x, value = 0x%x, field = %u, "
+ dev_dbg(pfc->dev, "%s: write_reg addr = %x, value = 0x%x, field = %u, "
"r_width = %u, f_width = %u\n",
+ crp->name,
crp->reg, value, field, crp->reg_width, crp->field_width);

mask = ~(mask << pos);
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
index a490834..2b593fc 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct pinmux_func {
};

struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
+ const char *name;
u32 reg;
u8 reg_width, field_width;
const u16 *enum_ids;
@@ -110,7 +111,8 @@ struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
* (from left to right, i.e. MSB to LSB), 2^f_width enum IDs must be specified,
* one for each possible combination of the register field bit values.
*/
-#define PINMUX_CFG_REG(name, r, r_width, f_width) \
+#define PINMUX_CFG_REG(_name, r, r_width, f_width) \
+ .name = _name, \
.reg = r, .reg_width = r_width, .field_width = f_width, \
.enum_ids = (const u16 [(r_width / f_width) * (1 << f_width)])

@@ -125,7 +127,8 @@ struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
* (from left to right, i.e. MSB to LSB), 2^var_fwi enum IDs must be specified,
* one for each possible combination of the register field bit values.
*/
-#define PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR(name, r, r_width, var_fw0, var_fwn...) \
+#define PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR(_name, r, r_width, var_fw0, var_fwn...) \
+ .name = _name, \
.reg = r, .reg_width = r_width, \
.var_field_width = (const u8 [r_width]) \
{ var_fw0, var_fwn, 0 }, \
@@ -465,7 +468,7 @@ struct sh_pfc_soc_info {
*/
#define PORTCR(nr, reg) \
{ \
- PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR("PORT" nr "CR", reg, 8, 2, 2, 1, 3) {\
+ PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR("PORT" #nr "CR", reg, 8, 2, 2, 1, 3) {\
/* PULMD[1:0], handled by .set_bias() */ \
0, 0, 0, 0, \
/* IE and OE */ \
--
1.9.1

2016-03-16 00:48:22

by Kuninori Morimoto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx

From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>

Gen2 / Gen3 datasheet will have below note in next version.
This patch follows this note.

IPSRx and MOD_SELx registers shall be set before setting GPSRx
registers in case that they need to be configured.
MOD_SELx registers can be set either earlier or later than setting
IPSRx registers.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
index 2b593fc..f174d61 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ struct sh_pfc_soc_info {
* - msel: Module selector
*/
#define PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL(ipsr, fn, msel) \
- PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##msel, FN_##ipsr, FN_##fn)
+ PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##msel, FN_##fn, FN_##ipsr)

/*
* Describe a pinmux configuration for a single-function pin with GPIO
--
1.9.1

2016-03-16 08:27:30

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: enable to indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL for debug

Hi Morimoto-san,

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>
> Current sh_pfc can't indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL name for debug.
> Of course we can get it from indicated register address, but it
> is not convenient. This patch enables to indicate these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>

> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct pinmux_func {
> };
>
> struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
> + const char *name;

Have you looked at the size increase, esp. for multi-platform kernels?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2016-03-16 08:32:36

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx

Hi Morimoto-san,

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>
> Gen2 / Gen3 datasheet will have below note in next version.
> This patch follows this note.
>
> IPSRx and MOD_SELx registers shall be set before setting GPSRx
> registers in case that they need to be configured.
> MOD_SELx registers can be set either earlier or later than setting
> IPSRx registers.

Does this note apply to R-Car Gen1 and SH7734, too?
Both use the PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL() macro.

> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> index 2b593fc..f174d61 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ struct sh_pfc_soc_info {
> * - msel: Module selector
> */
> #define PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL(ipsr, fn, msel) \
> - PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##msel, FN_##ipsr, FN_##fn)
> + PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##msel, FN_##fn, FN_##ipsr)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2016-03-17 00:24:04

by Kuninori Morimoto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx


Hi Geert

> > From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
> >
> > Gen2 / Gen3 datasheet will have below note in next version.
> > This patch follows this note.
> >
> > IPSRx and MOD_SELx registers shall be set before setting GPSRx
> > registers in case that they need to be configured.
> > MOD_SELx registers can be set either earlier or later than setting
> > IPSRx registers.
>
> Does this note apply to R-Car Gen1 and SH7734, too?
> Both use the PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL() macro.

Yes, this note can be match for these.
But I'm not sure whether these datasheet will be updated.

2016-03-17 00:30:37

by Kuninori Morimoto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: enable to indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL for debug


Hi Geert

> > From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
> >
> > Current sh_pfc can't indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL name for debug.
> > Of course we can get it from indicated register address, but it
> > is not convenient. This patch enables to indicate these.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct pinmux_func {
> > };
> >
> > struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
> > + const char *name;
>
> Have you looked at the size increase, esp. for multi-platform kernels?

Indeed.
I checked its size by "ls -l", and the result is below.
zImage size was... reduced ??

without this patch

10661888 Image
3544032 zImage

with this patch

10661888 Image
3543432 zImage


2016-03-17 07:34:08

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: enable to indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL for debug

Hi Morimoto-san,

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > Current sh_pfc can't indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL name for debug.
>> > Of course we can get it from indicated register address, but it
>> > is not convenient. This patch enables to indicate these.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>>
>> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
>> > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct pinmux_func {
>> > };
>> >
>> > struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
>> > + const char *name;
>>
>> Have you looked at the size increase, esp. for multi-platform kernels?
>
> Indeed.
> I checked its size by "ls -l", and the result is below.
> zImage size was... reduced ??
>
> without this patch
>
> 10661888 Image
> 3544032 zImage
>
> with this patch
>
> 10661888 Image
> 3543432 zImage

Please use "size drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/built-in.o".

zImage size is affected by section alignment and crompression.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2016-03-17 16:44:16

by Laurent Pinchart

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: enable to indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL for debug

Hi Morimoto-san,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday 16 March 2016 00:47:48 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>
> Current sh_pfc can't indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL name for debug.
> Of course we can get it from indicated register address, but it
> is not convenient. This patch enables to indicate these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 9 ++++++---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
> index 0c2d14c..c59f858 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
> @@ -204,8 +204,9 @@ static void sh_pfc_write_config_reg(struct sh_pfc *pfc,
>
> sh_pfc_config_reg_helper(pfc, crp, field, &mapped_reg, &mask, &pos);
>
> - dev_dbg(pfc->dev, "write_reg addr = %x, value = 0x%x, field = %u, "
> + dev_dbg(pfc->dev, "%s: write_reg addr = %x, value = 0x%x, field = %u, "
> "r_width = %u, f_width = %u\n",
> + crp->name,
> crp->reg, value, field, crp->reg_width, crp->field_width);
>
> mask = ~(mask << pos);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h index a490834..2b593fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct pinmux_func {
> };
>
> struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
> + const char *name;

This will increase the kernel size, I would remove the name field when
compiling the kernel in non-debug mode. You could use CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG or
CONFIG_DEBUG_PINCTRL.

> u32 reg;
> u8 reg_width, field_width;
> const u16 *enum_ids;
> @@ -110,7 +111,8 @@ struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
> * (from left to right, i.e. MSB to LSB), 2^f_width enum IDs must be
> specified, * one for each possible combination of the register field bit
> values. */
> -#define PINMUX_CFG_REG(name, r, r_width, f_width) \
> +#define PINMUX_CFG_REG(_name, r, r_width, f_width) \
> + .name = _name, \
> .reg = r, .reg_width = r_width, .field_width = f_width, \
> .enum_ids = (const u16 [(r_width / f_width) * (1 << f_width)])
>
> @@ -125,7 +127,8 @@ struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
> * (from left to right, i.e. MSB to LSB), 2^var_fwi enum IDs must be
> specified, * one for each possible combination of the register field bit
> values. */
> -#define PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR(name, r, r_width, var_fw0, var_fwn...) \
> +#define PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR(_name, r, r_width, var_fw0, var_fwn...) \
> + .name = _name, \
> .reg = r, .reg_width = r_width, \
> .var_field_width = (const u8 [r_width]) \
> { var_fw0, var_fwn, 0 }, \
> @@ -465,7 +468,7 @@ struct sh_pfc_soc_info {
> */
> #define PORTCR(nr, reg) \
> { \
> - PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR("PORT" nr "CR", reg, 8, 2, 2, 1, 3) {\
> + PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR("PORT" #nr "CR", reg, 8, 2, 2, 1, 3) {\
> /* PULMD[1:0], handled by .set_bias() */ \
> 0, 0, 0, 0, \
> /* IE and OE */ \

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

2016-03-17 16:44:33

by Laurent Pinchart

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx

Hi Morimoto-san,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday 16 March 2016 00:48:11 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>
> Gen2 / Gen3 datasheet will have below note in next version.
> This patch follows this note.
>
> IPSRx and MOD_SELx registers shall be set before setting GPSRx
> registers in case that they need to be configured.
> MOD_SELx registers can be set either earlier or later than setting
> IPSRx registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h index 2b593fc..f174d61 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ struct sh_pfc_soc_info {
> * - msel: Module selector
> */
> #define PINMUX_IPSR_MSEL(ipsr, fn, msel) \
> - PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##msel, FN_##ipsr, FN_##fn)
> + PINMUX_DATA(fn##_MARK, FN_##msel, FN_##fn, FN_##ipsr)
>
> /*
> * Describe a pinmux configuration for a single-function pin with GPIO

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

2016-03-18 00:38:16

by Kuninori Morimoto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: enable to indicate GPSR/IPSR/MOD_SEL for debug


Hi Laurent, Geert

> > struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
> > + const char *name;
>
> This will increase the kernel size, I would remove the name field when
> compiling the kernel in non-debug mode. You could use CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG or
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PINCTRL.

OK, [1/2] patch is not a big deal.
I'm happy if [2/2] was accepted.

2016-03-22 13:19:09

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>
> Gen2 / Gen3 datasheet will have below note in next version.
> This patch follows this note.
>
> IPSRx and MOD_SELx registers shall be set before setting GPSRx
> registers in case that they need to be configured.
> MOD_SELx registers can be set either earlier or later than setting
> IPSRx registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>

I wait for Geert to either queue this for his first v4.7 pull request
or tell me to apply it for fixes. Is it a regression?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2016-03-22 14:30:36

by Geert Uytterhoeven

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx

Hi Linus,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>>
>> Gen2 / Gen3 datasheet will have below note in next version.
>> This patch follows this note.
>>
>> IPSRx and MOD_SELx registers shall be set before setting GPSRx
>> registers in case that they need to be configured.
>> MOD_SELx registers can be set either earlier or later than setting
>> IPSRx registers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <[email protected]>
>
> I wait for Geert to either queue this for his first v4.7 pull request
> or tell me to apply it for fixes. Is it a regression?

I'm not aware of any issues due to this.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

2016-03-22 14:33:31

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I wait for Geert to either queue this for his first v4.7 pull request
>> or tell me to apply it for fixes. Is it a regression?
>
> I'm not aware of any issues due to this.

OK just queue it with the rest.

I assume there will still be lots of action in sh-pfc for this merge
window.

Yours,
Linus Walleij